Easy streaming 

Smartphone app changing the way we broadcast news.


Things have really changed over the course of my career as a journalist. Actually, to call it a "career" is really a bit of a joke – I've only been here for two years. The point is that even in that short time, we've seen some exciting changes in the way news is transmitted to readers/viewers.

For hard-core newshounds, Twitter really was a game-changer. The service, at least to my knowledge, wasn't widely used even two years ago, but that's changed. Every news outlet and most local reporters have informative and oft-updated feeds. Can't attend a meeting or an event? Don't worry about it. Someone else is, and they're live-Tweeting 140-character updates, keeping you posted on what's going on. Like anything, you have to consider the source, but with a good mix of feeds you can usually come away with a pretty good understanding of what happened.

But Twitter is so last year. Don't get me wrong, I'm still an obsessive Twitter user, but now there are ways to get the news to an audience more quickly and without a filter. I'm talking about live streaming video. You no longer need a $200,000 satellite truck, high-quality cameras, professional photographers, well-placed microphones or high-dollar light sets to do it. All you really need is an Android phone.

Justin.tv, a live-streaming smartphone app, allows users to broadcast instantly from anywhere. You can download the app to your Android phone or iPhone, although the iPhone doesn't have a broadcast option just yet. That's coming, developers say.

What's great about the service is you no longer have to rely on anyone else for instant analysis, or keep up with multiple Twitter feeds. You can watch a news event as it unfolds.

Two weeks ago the Times broadcast a press conference held by Republican candidate for governor Jim Keet. I sat in the front row, phone in hand, and broadcast the entire presser from my Justin.tv channel. The video, which can be embedded directly into a blog post, was then placed on the front page of our website on the Arkansas Blog. Live video. On a blog. We couldn't believe how great it turned out.

If you miss the live broadcast, you can tune in later and watch a saved version of the video, as nearly 3,000 people have done with the Keet video (that's a lot of viewers for a boring, run-of-the-mill press conference).

And the quality's not that bad. The video was a little pixilated, but that's to be expected. The stream was steady and reliable, unlike a couple of other services we've tried like Qik and Ustream, and the audio was clear.

The best thing about Justin.tv's app is its simplicity. It's easier to use than other services, the interface is very similar to a Flip camera (that is, it's idiot-proof) and letting people know you're going live is a snap. Once you press record, the service sends a message to all of your Twitter followers and Facebook friends and provides a link to the broadcast. According to Mashable, a popular tech blog, "Justin.tv may not have been the first player in the live-video-from-mobile game, in our opinion and experience, its product is still the best available to consumers right now."

Jason Tolbert, author of the Tolbert Report blog, broadcast the recent Lincoln/Boozman debate live from Justin.tv (my battery was dead). The event also got the streaming treatment from Fox 16, which did a great job and offered a slick, well-produced broadcast on its website. The content was the same; the only difference was production value, quality and the price tag. I doubt any local news outlet can broadcast an event at literally no cost. One thing that YouTube and the Internet have shown us is that people are willing to watch a low-quality video as long as they are interested in the content.

Of course, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do it all the time, or rely on the technology too heavily. Journalists should not abdicate their responsibility – giving a careful and thoughtful account of a news event, complete with enough information and analysis to place that event in its appropriate context – to a smartphone app. But it will be interesting to see how these tools are used in the future and how audiences and news organizations continue to interact with them. As with any new technology, it will be a wonder to see what new gadget will render it completely obsolete.


From the ArkTimes store



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Gerard Matthews

Most Shared

Latest in Media

  • UA cozy with D-G columnist

    An interesting element of the ongoing story of budget problems in the University of Arkansas Advancement Division has been a divide in outlook in the pages of the state's dominant news medium, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
    • Nov 21, 2013
  • Democrat-Gazette covers one of its own in story of reporter Cathy Frye's rescue

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's reports on the rescue of its reporter Cathy Frye, who was missing for days in the hot scrubby desert that is Big Bend Ranch State Park, are gripping.
    • Oct 10, 2013
  • Hodge shares his OA vision

    Roger Hodge, the new editor of Oxford American magazine, talked about his rise at Harper's, his writing philosophy and his plans for the OA before a full crowd last Wednesday at the Clinton School.
    • Sep 26, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Head-shaking

    Another edition of so-much-bad-news-so-little space.
  • Narrow opening for Arkansas Democrats

    "Somebody in this room — it's time to go big or go home." At the Democratic Party of Arkansas's Clinton Dinner last weekend, Gov. John Bel Edwards of Louisiana used his platform as keynote speaker to embolden a candidate to step up to run for governor against incumbent Republican Governor Hutchinson.
  • Buyer remorse

    Out here in flyover country, you can't hardly go by the feed store without running into a reporter doing one of those Wisdom of the Heartland stories.
  • Not Whitewater

    Just think: If Democrats had turned out 78,000 more votes in three states in November, people could be reveling today in the prospect of impeaching and convicting President Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, as some Republican lawmakers had promised to try to do if she won.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Another Jesus

    • Sorry, I have never written about Hillary Clinton's "blunders" in Benghazi. Since you call them…

    • on July 25, 2017
  • Re: Another Jesus

    • IBS, were you there in Benghazi to personally witness all of Hillary's blunders like you…

    • on July 23, 2017
  • Re: Another Jesus

    • If God felt it necessary to replace the ten commandments, he could do it like…

    • on July 23, 2017

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation