Favorite

Editorial June 30 

Why do they hate America? It’s not the flag that makes America great, it’s the freedom. Other countries have flags, some of them rather pretty. They don’t have anything as beautiful as Americans’ right to say what we please, or to worship as we want. American troops have died fighting to pre-serve those rights. Descendants of American heroes are now asked to dishonor their forebears, to voluntarily surrender what could not be taken forcibly, and they are beseeched to do so by politicians who value liberty about as much as Middle Eastern terrorists do. One of their favorite arguments, in fact, is that the United States must deny liberty to its people because our enemies deny liberty to theirs. The kindest thing that can be said of such politicians — and it is too kind, really — is that they misunderstand the country they are sworn to serve. Nonetheless, the House of Representatives has capitulated, approving 286 to 130 a constitutional amendment backed by President Bush and his party that would outlaw flag-burning. The amendment goes to the Senate next. Confused and intimidated, three members of the Arkansas House delegation voted for the amendment — Berry, Boozman, Ross. Only Rep. Vic Snyder voted “no.” How often does Vic Snyder show the best side of Arkansas to the nation? Very often indeed. It’s noteworthy that Snyder is the only veteran in the Arkansas delegation, having served as a Marine Corps rifleman in Vietnam. He has no inclination toward, or need for, the pretend-patriotism that some of his non-veteran colleagues adopt. The flag is a symbol, and like other symbols, it can’t be destroyed no matter how many times you put a match to it, how much cloth is consumed. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY, explained it to the House bluntly: “If the flag needs protection at all, it needs protection from members of Congress who value the symbol more than the freedoms that the flag represents.” The true purpose of flag-burning is not to start a fire, but to inflame passions. It is a form of free speech, and as such, protected by the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. The United States Supreme Court has so ruled. To protect unpopular speech is why we have a First Amendment, remember. The speech that everyone agrees with needs no protection. The true purpose of a ban on flag-burning is to stifle dissent. Nothing could be more un-American. This country was founded on dissent. Slaves were freed because of dissent, women enfranchised, law-breaking presidents removed from office. And when we have strayed furthest from our ideals, whether exterminating Indians, lynching blacks, or imprisoning Japanese-Americans, it is lack of dissent that has betrayed us.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Trump's 'deal' on wall and dreamers is no bargain

    Donald Trump unveiled his great plan today — temporary protection for "dreamers" in return for  $5.7 billion worth of wall — but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has already explained why it falls short and some on is side are already crying "no amnesty."
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • An open line for reproductive justice

    Rain drove the speakers inside to the old Senate chamber at the state Capitol, but the rally for reproductive justice went on today as does the fight in a state where the majority who assemble at the Capitol most often act to restrict women's medical rights. The line is open on this and other topics.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • Cotton, Boozman propose estate tax bonanza for billionaires

    Tom Cotton and John Boozman are dishonestly touting legislation that is a bonanza for the super wealthy as help for small businesses and farmers.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • More »

More by Arkansas Times Staff

  • Friday's headlines and your holiday open line

    What happened at the State Board of Education and what does it mean; Legislation filed for Hutchinson's government reorganization plan; Pediatric flu-related death in Arkansas reported; Suspect arrested in unsolved 2008 North Little Rock homicide.
    • Dec 21, 2018
  • New episode of Rock the Culture: "Juice In Your Own Life"

    In this week’s episode, Charles and Antwan provide perspective and conversation on the Little Rock Mayoral Election and State Board of Education’s consideration of the anticipated request to waive the Fair Teacher Dismissal Act. In addition, Charles and Antwan discuss all things happening in the Little Rock School District with Superintendent Michael Poore.
    • Dec 11, 2018
  • End of the week headlines and your open line

    Alderman candidate misses chance to cast deciding vote for himself in runoff election; Dem-Gaz to phase out print delivery in El Dorado, Camden and Magnolia; Rapert threatens UA Fort Smith over 'Drag Queen Story Time' event; The Van seeks to raise $35,000 in three weeks for new warehouse facility in South Little Rock.
    • Dec 7, 2018
  • More »

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • How nice... the lawyerly Democritus offers a personal criticism, without benefit of the reason for…

    • on January 18, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Please tell me that the Times did not give Lyons money to produce this drivel…

    • on January 17, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Perhaps, dss, the relevant data is found in the types of jobs held by men…

    • on January 16, 2019
 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation