Favorite

Embarrassed, mayor? 

Rogers Mayor Steve Womack and developer Charles Reaves are discussing a reduction in the size of a tax increment finance district along Interstate 540, the Northwest edition of the Democrat-Gazette reported last Sunday. The TIF district is currently five miles along the hottest stretch of commercial real estate in Arkansas, if not the United States. The mayor is talking about restricting the district to the Pleasant Grove overpass and some adjacent land. At least for now, with other, smaller TIF districts to come. Why? Give the mayor credit for candor, if not integrity. “There is no question that a project-specific TIF is smaller and draws less attention,” Womack told the D-G. “There will be less flies swarming around. Anyone who would challenge us could not say the area has enough infrastructure. We think we meet the ‘blight’ test.” I don’t have space sufficient for explanation and outrage. But here goes. A TIF district, as enabled by a 2005 law, allows cities to take school property taxes and give them to private businesses for infrastructure or even private projects. It’s a developer/bond daddy dream come true. Please note that the mayor is talking to the developer, not voters, about changes in Rogers’ existing TIF district. The developer wants a $7.6 million overpass to improve access to his 1.2-million-square-foot Pleasant Crossing retail center. “The ingress and egress into any commercial establishment is very important because it is part of the shopping experience for the customer,” developer Reaves told the D-G. Indeed. So why can’t the blankety-blank shopping center developer pay? Because that’s not the Arkansas way. Only chumps and working stiffs pay taxes. The rich guys get to keep their tax money for improvements to their property. Sen. Tim Wooldridge, who shepherded TIF legislation through the Senate, says developer Reaves is exactly right. If undeveloped land needs infrastructure, that meets the statutory definition of blight and thus qualifies for tax advantages, Wooldridge told the D-G. So there it is. Any piece of vacant land in Arkansas, no matter how expensive, qualifies for taxpayer subsidy if it could use some infrastructure. Womack seems to be feeling a little nervous about the ill appearance of transferring money from school kids to Charles Reaves’ pockets. But he’s mistaken if he thinks carving the big TIF into a series of smaller TIF projects is somehow more legal. Size doesn’t address the core issue. Is it constitutional to take money approved by voters for schools to help a shopping center developer? Also, did the TIF constitutional amendment repeal the constitutional amendment requiring a 25-mill local property tax for schools? Hats off to state Rep. Rick Saunders of Hot Springs, who tried without success to restrict TIF use to truly blighted areas. The Rogers land in the TIF district is already developing. It needs no corporate welfare to develop, he noted. “Undeveloped land is not blighted and I’ll argue with them until I meet my maker,” Saunders told the D-G. Womack’s noise about scaling back the TIF grab is a small hopeful sign. He needs to hear from more people like Saunders. Meanwhile, he could answer me this: If Reaves’ huge shopping center needs an overpass, why not form an improvement district or ask taxpayers to approve a bond issue backed by property or sales taxes to pay for it? Why rob the schools?
Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • The Arkansas swamp

    The Arkansas Capitol is a fetid swamp of corruption and the bipartisan lack of concern tells you plenty.
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation