Favorite

Equal aid per child -- just not fair 


State money for schools ought to be distributed equally per child. That sounds so basic. You wonder how anyone could argue.


You should visit with two of the best Democratic state senators, Stephen Bryles of Blytheville and Jim Luker of Wynne. That's eastern Arkansas, where school districts are poor and losing students.


Let's say you have a small, poor school district in a withering town in the Delta that, from one year to the next, loses 50 students. Let's apply to that level of attrition the current per-pupil state outlay, $5,400.


On a strict per-pupil distribution, which is how most but not all of our state school aid is handled, the district would sustain a loss in state funds of $270,000.


So, a district that was poor to begin with, with lower teacher salaries and lower student test scores than the prosperous areas of the state, is supposed to extract nearly $300,000 from its annual budget. Yet there's not much flexibility in the costs of salaries, transportation and utilities. Those will be pretty much the same year to year, even higher via inflation, with or without 50 youngsters.


You end up cutting funding to the students who are left in the poor districts, and who were underprivileged already. You take their money from last year and send it to new enrollees at thriving places like Bentonville, Rogers, Conway, Mountain Home, Siloam Springs, Cabot and Bryant.


You do that at the very time you're supposed to be obliging a Supreme Court order to equalize educational opportunities for kids from the Delta to the Ozarks.


That consolidation might fix this is beside the point once consolidation fails.


We have a mitigating factor. We send extra money per-child for students who are sufficiently poor to qualify for the federal lunch program.


But there are poor kids in rich areas, too. Springdale, Rogers, Conway, Mountain Home -- these places have substantial percentages of their student bodies who qualify for this aid, though nothing like the 90 percent common in eastern Arkansas districts.


The state attempts to address that. The poverty subsidy is graduated according to the percentage of the student body qualifying for the lunches.


Still, the combined effect of per-pupil funding with poverty subsidies tends to be this: A rich district in the northwestern corner of the state or in suburban Little Rock ends up getting not only more state money each year from natural growth, but also nice supplemental chunks for substantial raw numbers of students qualifying for student lunches. The poor and declining districts get less year to year.


Thus the gap between rich and poor widens even as the court orders us to equalize and even as we claim to be complying.


Bryles intends to offer amendments to address this inequity in the forthcoming special session that the legislative leadership wants to keep simpler than that.


First he probably will propose that declining districts be granted the option to base their enrollment figures on a three-year average, not the actual current enrollment. That cushions the blow from year to year.


Then he wants to tinker with the school-lunch subsidy, probably to send yet more money to districts with poverty-level student populations above the statewide average.

To avoid a fight he couldn't possibly win, he probably will propose to hold all districts harmless on poverty funding, so that the rich, growing, politically potent districts wouldn't actually lose.
The Legislature ought to be able to slow the special session train long enough to let this kind of fairness and logic hop on.

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

More by Max Brantley

  • TGIF: News roundup, open line

    The week-ending news roundup and open line.
    • Oct 19, 2018
  • Rich white people fund PAC behind racist attack ads supporting French Hill UPDATE

    More reporting on the people contributing to Black Americans for the President's Agenda, which is running racist ads in Little Rock in support of Republican Rep. French Hill. The money isn't coming from black Americans, but wealthy conservative Republicans such as an owner of the San Francisco Giants. GOP feeling heat, files ethics complaint on ad.
    • Oct 19, 2018
  • Another made-up Republican attack: The Saline County socialists are coming to take your business

    The latest in bogus Republican political attacks comes from Saline County, where Steve Lux, chairman of the county Republican Committee, has sent a letter warning members of the Benton-Bryant Chamber of Commerce that a progressive group working to elect Democrats in the county is allied with a socialist group that wants nothing less than "the elimination of private business." This is, of course, nonsense.
    • Oct 19, 2018
  • More »

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The mob

    • Investigator, I wouldn't be too hard on poor Kate. She isn't much more than your…

    • on October 19, 2018
  • Re: Elizabeth Warren, still a contender

    • Perhaps, but she sure does cling to a lie with the same shameless derangement, though…

    • on October 19, 2018
  • Re: Elizabeth Warren, still a contender

    • Oh, Stevi"e", what BS. Just for one example, Warren has certainly demonstrated that her vocabulary…

    • on October 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation