Favorite

Ethics lessons from Huckabee 

The state Ethics Commission and its staff deserve praise for last week's handling of an investigation of Lt. Gov. Mike Huckabee's campaign finances.

In a unanimous bipartisan vote, the Commission scolded Huckabee for abysmal bookkeeping and excessive post-election spending. In essence, he used the pretext of retiring a $17,000 campaign debt to justify a $100,000 political operation.

The Commission stopped short of sanctions because Huckabee himself had asked for the review, albeit in response to media pressure.

The finding sends a message that the ethics law, if unspecific, is not vague. It means what it says when it allows spending after an election "solely" to retire campaign debt--not to pay permanent staff with duties unrelated to fund-raising and to make general political appearances. Certainly not during a legislative session, when fund-raising is prohibited by law. Other valuable lessons:

• Campaign reporting forms need to be changed. There's no place to report campaign expenses that have been incurred, but not paid. This helped create the confusion about Huckabee's actual 1994 campaign debt.

• The commission and the legislature should emulate other states and eliminate all post-election fund-raising. A couple of reasons: 1) Only winners have much luck raising money after a campaign. That's when campaign contributions take on the appearance of a quid in search of a quo. 2) Any smart candidate will be sure to finish in debt so as to justify on-going political operations. We should also prohibit candidates who finish campaigns in the black to keep surpluses for themselves.

• The law should limit travel reimbursements to actual expenses. Huckabee charged his campaign for 30 cents a mile for his wife's driving trips. That's far more than actual vehicle costs, a hidden salary in effect.

• If post-election fund-raising is to continue, the law may need more definition about what constitutes a legitimate campaign expense so as to discourage searches for loopholes.

• Payments to credit card companies are not adequate disclosures of campaign expenses. As the Commission investigation showed, Huckabee's credit card payments were not supported by credit card receipts. He contends the payments went to legitimate travel expenses in any case, but his sloppy bookkeeping illustrated the potential abuses in loosey-goosey credit card billing. The law already requires disclosure of specific expenses of $100 or more. It should be enforced.

Huckabee argues that he did taxpayers a favor by charging his campaign, rather than his public office, for trips to coon suppers and tomato festivals and the like. That's poor justification for breaking the campaign finance law, intentionally or not. There is no law that says Huckabee can't pay for out-of-season politicking from his own pocket.

Print headline: "Ethics Lesson From Huckabee" February 9, 1996

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Speaking of...

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Are you being served?

    These aren't good times for confidence in public servants.

    • Mar 22, 2018
  • Send in the segs

    The state Board of Education last week rejected requests from Camden Fairview, Hope, Lafayette County and Junction City to be exempt from the state law requiring students to be able to freely transfer between school districts.
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • Rich get richer

    Arkansas State University heard from a paid consultant last week about ways to become more efficient — make more money, in other words — and perhaps even serve students better.
    • Mar 8, 2018
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Bad law

    Ideally, every addict would have free access to excellent inpatient treatment immediately and could obtain leave from work and financial obligations so they could take advantage of that opportunity. But that isn't the reality of the world we live in here in Arkansas.
  • Flooding the swamp

    It became clear the first week of his presidency what Donald Trump meant with his repeated campaign pledges to "drain the swamp," the moneyed culture of Wall Street and corporate lobbyists who dictate the laws and rules of governing in Washington.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Bad law

    • First paragraph, addresses the problems... "How dirty is San Francisco? An NBC Bay Area Investigation…

    • on May 21, 2018
  • Re: Flooding the swamp

    • The posted price for humalog insulin in the USA is 588$ in Canada it is…

    • on May 21, 2018
  • Re: Bad law

    • The article about the Bay Area addresses the Homeless issue, not drug users or syringes…

    • on May 21, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation