Favorite

Exclusive courts 

There's much talk these days about diversity being desirable, but the testimony hasn't been admitted in the Supreme Court chamber.

If Elena Kagan is confirmed to replace Justice John Paul Stevens, every member of the Court will be a graduate of either Harvard Law or Yale Law. Justice Stevens, who has announced his retirement, attended Northwestern Law. The Court didn't suffer.

What does this exclusivity say to students at any of the other hundreds of law schools in America? “Curb your dreams. You'll never get one of the top jobs.” What sort of justice can we expect from a court that accepts the Clarence Thomases and excludes the Bill Wilsons?

Another distinction, even more important, will leave with Stevens. He is the last Protestant on the court. With Stevens gone, the biggest religious group in the country, “the non-Catholic Christians,” as some surveys call them, will not have a single representative on the court, although they account for more than half of all the Americans who call themselves religious.

One-fourth of the religious population is Catholic, yet Catholics hold six seats – two-thirds – on the court. Religious Jews, who constitute one percent of the population, will hold the other one-third of Supreme Court seats if Kagan is approved.

It is not a coincidence that Justice Stevens is a strict separationist of church and state, vigorously upholding the First Amendment's guarantee of religious freedom. Just last month, a five-Catholic majority overruled a lower court order that a statue of a cross be removed from public land. The majority held, more or less, that everybody loves a cross. Justice Stevens dissented: “The cross is not a universal symbol of sacrifice. It is the symbol of one particular sacrifice, and that sacrifice carries deeply significant meaning for those who adhere to the Christian faith.” And not, we'll add, for those who are Jews or Muslims or Buddhists or atheists.

In another case, Stevens dissented from a ruling that upheld voucher subsidies for private schools. He noted that most of the public funds went to religious institutions. Most of these were Catholic.

“Whenever we remove a brick from the wall that was designed to separate religion and government,” Stevens wrote, “we increase the risk of religious strife and weaken the foundations of our democracy.”

There's reason to fear for religious freedom when two-thirds of the Supreme Court justices are members of a sect that disrespects the wall of separation between church and state, and is instead the principal force behind repeated efforts to send public money to private schools. And when anyone who sounds the alarm is accused of religious bigotry.

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

  • Friday's headlines and your holiday open line

    What happened at the State Board of Education and what does it mean; Legislation filed for Hutchinson's government reorganization plan; Pediatric flu-related death in Arkansas reported; Suspect arrested in unsolved 2008 North Little Rock homicide.
    • Dec 21, 2018
  • New episode of Rock the Culture: "Juice In Your Own Life"

    In this week’s episode, Charles and Antwan provide perspective and conversation on the Little Rock Mayoral Election and State Board of Education’s consideration of the anticipated request to waive the Fair Teacher Dismissal Act. In addition, Charles and Antwan discuss all things happening in the Little Rock School District with Superintendent Michael Poore.
    • Dec 11, 2018
  • End of the week headlines and your open line

    Alderman candidate misses chance to cast deciding vote for himself in runoff election; Dem-Gaz to phase out print delivery in El Dorado, Camden and Magnolia; Rapert threatens UA Fort Smith over 'Drag Queen Story Time' event; The Van seeks to raise $35,000 in three weeks for new warehouse facility in South Little Rock.
    • Dec 7, 2018
  • More »

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Of Freud and foolishness

    I’ve been suspicious of psychologists bearing theories ever since my graduate school "Eureka!" about Freud and Dostoyevsky.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • I can only speak for myself; but, it seems that I was never quite so…

    • on January 15, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Hear ! Hear ! Down with poppycock !

    • on January 15, 2019
 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation