Favorite

Fayetteville's snow day goes to high court 

That snow-day controversy in Washington County Circuit Court in Fayetteville has now been elevated to the Arkansas Supreme Court.

The case presents a worthy issue: May a judge banish a lawyer he doesn't like from his court?

You'd think not.

Let's refresh our memories from a column in this space in early March.

They got 23 inches of snow one day in February in Fayetteville. But Circuit Judge William Storey, a judge for more than two decades, had a big procedural day planned the next morning.

Because he wanted to be accessible to any petitioners who might have come to town for the occasion, he held his court open despite the conditions.

This judge handles about 85 percent of the criminal cases in Washington County.

On Facebook the day before, a deputy public defender, Julie Tolleson, complained about this holding of court. She wrote that nobody in power gave a rat's behind about poor people who could not easily get themselves transported safely to court in such conditions. She wrote that the policy of holding court on such days was irrational.

Storey is not a Facebook guy, but a friend of his was, and this friend informed the judge of Tolleson's post.

Storey did not like what he read. He does not take lightly, he told me, allegations that he doesn't give a rat's posterior about people and that he is irrational.

(For the record, Tolleson referred generally to people in power not giving a rat's behind and to the irrational nature not of the judge himself, or altogether, but of this particular court-holding policy.)

The first thing Storey did was say he'd disqualify from all cases in which Tolleson brought a case into his court, thus severely impairing her ability to do her job. But then he delivered an order to the head public defender directing him not to assign Tolleson to any matters that would bring her into his line of sight.

So let's get to the update: Tolleson went out and got herself a Little Rock lawyer, Jeff Rosenzweig, who asked Judge Storey for a hearing on this presumed banishment. Hearing nothing from the judge directly, and learning only that Storey had sent a letter to the state Supreme Court asking it to appoint a special judge, Rosenzweig decided late last week to go straight to the Supreme Court himself.

He filed a petition in Tolleson's behalf asking the high court to take a brief hiatus from summer vacation and issue one or more of assorted writs. One would direct Storey not to ban Tolleson from his court, but to disqualify himself if he was the one with the problem. Another would mandate a local hearing on the matter and appoint a special judge for the purpose.

In support of the argument that a judge may not simply banish a lawyer otherwise in good standing, Rosenzweig cited the seemingly crystal-clear precedent of a previous Supreme Court case — his own, from 1988, when Pulaski Circuit Court Judge Floyd Lofton presumed to tell Rosenzweig he never wanted to see him in his court again.

The Supreme Court said at that time that it "goes without saying" that a judge could not do that.

A special factor, Rosenzweig told me, is that Tolleson is the only Spanish-speaking deputy public defender in Washington County.

My conclusions are the same as before: A judge should not hold court with 23 inches of snow on the ground; a judge ought to rise by principle to tolerate lawyers he can't stand in the greater interest of justice for the persons represented by those lawyers, and deputy public defenders ought to be careful what they post on Facebook.

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Speaking of...

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • The battle over Issue 1

    The odds are that the most spending in a statewide campaign in Arkansas this year will not be for a constitutional office, but instead in a battle over a proposed state constitutional amendment.
  • The cult of Trump

    Nearly 40 years ago our country was introduced to two major phenomena centering around cults: namely, the Moonies and the Shiite Muslims. There were others, as well, and I soon became fascinated with the dynamics of cults and cult leaders (both religious and secular) in general — leading me to read a number of books and articles, some even written by those who had been deprogrammed after spending time in a cult.
  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
  • Trump doctrine

    Let's face it: President Trump enjoys hurting and humiliating people, and that's the thing some of his loudest supporters like about him. Making women and children cry makes him feel manly and powerful. The more defenseless, the better. He particularly enjoys punishing racial minorities.
  • Lights out

    I was taught to turn lights out when I was not using them. We pay extra for electricity to finance energy-saving programs that involve devices that turn lights out when not in use. Yet, the city of Little Rock recently sent an email advising citizens to combat crime by leaving outside lighting on all night. That is backward, ineffectual, potentially counterproductive and environmentally irresponsible advice.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation