Favorite

From train wreck to meltdown 

State Sens. David Bisbee of Rogers and Jim Argue of Little Rock are those rare state legislators. By that I mean they are experienced in the era of term limits by having served in both the House and Senate. They have demonstrated good intentions and sound judgment. They offer leadership, at least on the more manageable Senate end of the state Capitol's third floor. My separate conversations with them Tuesday revealed the depth of peril in the special legislative session now taking place. When the competent and well-intended begin to see the matter with diametric opposition, dangers have suddenly multiplied exponentially. People talked in recent weeks about a "train wreck" at this session. Just this week "meltdown" emerged as the word. A train wreck is a derailment. Meltdown is when Arkansas Nuclear One blows up and radioactivity is in the breeze headed your way. Bisbee agreed with much of what I had written that morning, though he hadn't seen it. It was that court control of our public schools simply must be avoided. It was that while consolidation is the appropriate, wise and eventually inevitable initiative, it is not specifically a mandate of the court ruling. It was that we must not use the decline of consolidation in the House of Representatives as an excuse to fail to meet explicit court mandates to enact a new school funding formula and put significantly higher amounts of money into it. Appointment of a court master to run our public schools would be an economic development disaster, Bisbee said. The spectacular growth in Northwest Arkansas would end abruptly, he said. A homebuilder himself, he said the land he'd started clearing for a new subdivision would go undeveloped if the state's public schools became court-run. Bisbee was alarmed that the governor of his party, Mike Huckabee, was saying openly that court control of the schools might be the best thing, considering House defeat of consolidation. He was distressed that Huckabee had indicated he wouldn't support new taxes without consolidation. He was surprised when he called business and civic leaders in Northwest Arkansas to encourage them to lean on Huckabee and found them to be in agreement with the governor. A couple of hours later, Argue also was standing firm with Huckabee. He told me he was having a hard time justifying higher taxes on his Little Rock constituents to send more money to tiny rural school districts funded with maybe 90 percent state dollars, then to hire a physics teacher - provided one could be found - to teach two kids. He said I was technically correct when I said consolidation wasn't specifically mentioned by the court. But he said I hadn't dotted all the i's. The only way to improve and equalize educational opportunities for all kids statewide, he said, is to spend significantly more. But it is unfair to taxpayers, he said, to throw new taxpayer dollars at a wildly inefficient structure that renders real equality unattainable or certainly cost-prohibitive. He said "restructuring," his euphemism for consolidation, "absolutely must be part of the package." I countered that it must be part of the eventual solution, but not necessarily part of the immediate legislative package. I asked him if he'd ever gone along with an imperfect legislative solution. He replied, "When have we not?" I asked Argue the direct question: Was he with Huckabee in saying we shouldn't raise taxes without consolidation and that court control of our schools might be the best alternative? He said that he was, except that he amended my question to describe court control as potentially the "least worst" alternative. He also contended that if court control comes to pass, I ought to blame the small-school obstructionists in the House and not the governor or him. I don't have a problem assigning most of the blame that way. I can't say about all of it.
Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Conspiracy theorists

    Back in 2000, I interviewed Rev. Jerry Falwell on camera in connection with a documentary film of "The Hunting of the President," which Joe Conason and I wrote.
  • The health of a hospital

    The Medicaid expansion helped Baxter County Regional Medical Center survive and thrive, but a federal repeal bill threatens to imperil it and its patients.
  • Virgil, quick come see

    There goes the Robert E. Lee. But the sentiment that built the monument? It's far from gone.
  • Real reform

    Arkansas voters, once perversely skeptical of complicated ballot issues like constitutional amendments, have become almost comical Pollyannas, ratifying the most shocking laws.
  • That modern mercantile: The bARn

    The bARn Mercantile — "the general store for the not so general," its slogan says — will open in the space formerly occupied by Ten Thousand Villages at 301A President Clinton Ave.

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Paddling the Fourche Creek Urban Water Trail

Paddling the Fourche Creek Urban Water Trail

Underutilized waterway is a hidden gem in urban Little Rock

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Not leaders

    As soon as I saw the Notre Dame graduates walking out of their own commencement ceremony as Vice President Mike Pence began to speak, I thought, "Oh no, here we go again."

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Not leaders

    • Jesus. You hate Hillary Clinton so much that you were complicit in dooming us to…

    • on May 26, 2017
  • Re: Conspiracy theorists

    • A investigator of both sides, you say? Okay, I plainly see one side, but I'm…

    • on May 26, 2017
  • Re: Conspiracy theorists

    • Ah- how the Trumpsters try to bend facts to his/their world. Call it what you…

    • on May 26, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation