Guns for everyone 

When he wasn't at the St. Louis zoo getting bit by a penguin last week, Newt Gingrich was across town berating the National Rifle Association for being too timid in its advocacy of gun ownership and gun use.

Newt wants everybody in the United States everywhere in the United States to be armed and ready to stand their ground, meaning ready to blow somebody's head off that looks at them funny. He wants more guns rather than fewer, and he'd revoke just about all the restrictions on them.

But that's not all he wants. Hell, that's standard NRA stroking and hardly newsworthy. Newt would go Cold Dead Hands one better, though, by extending Second Amendment lock-and-load rights not only to everybody in the country but to everybody in the world. Man, woman, child, hermaphrodite — although I'm not sure about the hermaphrodites. Black, white, yellow, brown, red. Turk, Swede, Tutsi. Newt is a pretty fanatical Christian when he remembers that he is, so under his scheme Christians might get better ammunition than Buddhists or Hindus or Mormons, or some similar advantage or perk, but even scoffer heathens would get the basic endowment. Frogs would. Ragheads. Psychos.

Pacifists would get arms whether they wanted them or not. So would castrati. Yellow-bellies. Ghandhites. Peaceniks. I don't know about fetuses.

In the Newt vision, if you're an Australian aborigine, you'd have a right to carry a gun — and not just to shoot wallabies instead of harvesting them by boomerang. With a mandatory Stand Your Ground rider, you could shoot Crocodile Dundee long as you claimed self-defense. Of course he'd have the same right to shoot you — he'd likely demur on the machete, homicide from it being harder to justify — but even with all the countless unending universal Mexican standoffs at least the gun-playing field would be leveler than it is now. The system we have in place now, in many countries half the time they treat you like a common criminal if you shoot somebody for sport or payback or target practice or because God told you to. Like you had a choice.

Muslim women wouldn't have to put up with nearly as much of the macho crap if you didn't know whether Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson were lurking there under every single burka in the seraglio. Where Khrushchev could only pound the podium with his shoe, any deposed butcher or aggrieved hedge-fund manager who wanted to address a plenary UN session could get the floor just by gatting off a few ahem bursts ceilingward. Castro would get a new gun, but so would every embittered anti-Fidel whose only satisfaction now is in driving around the presidential palace letting his derelict Plymouth Fury backfire.

If the U.S. Supreme Court felt obliged to intrude upon this new state of affairs, well, seven billion filled hands might persuade them to desist.

But dare I say there might be implementation problems?

Soon as everybody on earth gets their gun and authorization to fire it at will — whichever one is Will — then won't we be right back where we started, at Square One? The hombre who has only one gun will be at the mercy of whoever has two. And both of them will cower at the approach of the bully with the handgun, the shotgun, the squirrel rifle, the machine gun, some hand grenades, and perhaps a tank.

Hard to go up agin' a tank with just a roscoe. It can be done, but as a practical matter, you might as well be packing a chrysanthemum.

Two guns are better than one against a half-track, if one of them is a bazooka, but is Newt's Second Amendment extension going to include a bazooka for everybody in the world, too? OK, say it does. Everybody in the world gets a handgun, some long guns, and a bazooka. And even if you don't live in a gated community, you're authorized to off any suspicious-looking passerby wearing a hoodie. But what if the next hoodied passerby makes his pass in an F-22 Raptor fighter jet with its entire spread locked in on your pitiful-ass one-gun gluteus maximus?

And what if the hoodied guy after him commands a whole squadron of F-22s, and they're all armed with nuclear warheads, plus he can call in drones, cruise missiles, and assassin Navy Seals to take out your entire watch posse before you can wave a hankie? Is it the answer to continue escalating the balance of gun terror until we've furnished you and everybody else in the world with a personal arsenal that begins with your basic liquor-store burner and ranges up to and includes your own wristworn atomic bomb like the one the predator in "Predator" self-destructed with?

Every starving child in the Sudan would have a handgun and an atomic bomb under the Newt initiative. They might try to eat them, but that would be their business, not yours. More likely they'd swap one or the other for a goat. Or both of them for two goats. Somebody would have to procure and supply all those A-bombs and I'm sure Dick Cheney would volunteer Halliburton for the task, probably at no more of a profit than $10 or $20 quadrillion, or all the money in the world, whichever was greater.


Sign up for the Daily Update email

Speaking of Newt Gingrich

  • In Praise of Newt Gingrich open line

    August 14, 2013
    The line is open. Final words: * NEWT GINGRICH GETS IT RIGHT: How about this? /more/
  • Mike Huckabee said something stupid again

    February 22, 2013
    On his radio show today on this George Washington's birthday, Mike Huckabee and Newt Gingrich spent some time comparing President Obama and our first president. /more/
  • No Gingrich, no scorched earth

    February 8, 2012
    It is beginning to look like we will not have in 2012 one of those rare presidential races where the icons of the great tectonic movements in politics face off at Armageddon. /more/
  • Newt Gingrich's blow for adulter.., er, polyamory

    February 5, 2012
    I tend to think this is one of those bogus New York Times trend stories, but the feature writer still did dig up some people that revelations about Newt Gingrich's desire for an "open marriage" back in the days when he was boinking Callista while married to another has done wonders for those who think "polyamory" is hunkydory. /more/
  • Beau geste

    February 1, 2012
    the person who slew a Democratic activist's cat in Russellville a staunch Republican? Is he an actual or potential serial killer of humans as well as house pets? (Most serial killers seem to start out on animals.) Or is he both Republican and serial killer, like Ted Bundy, who was Mr. Young Republican by day while strangling coeds at night? At this point, we don't know for sure. The investigation is ongoing. /more/
  • Obamacare (Romneycare) off the table

    February 1, 2012
    Poor Rick Santorum could only shrug in frustration when he complained in the Florida debate about the supreme irony of the 2012 presidential race: Republicans made President Obama vulnerable two years ago by demonizing his health-insurance reforms and now they are about to nominate one of two men who cannot effectively use the issue against him. /more/
  • Republicans' choice: champions of 'Obamacare'

    January 31, 2012
    Rick Santorum is right, for once, Ernie Dumas writes this week. He says the race for the Republican nomination is boiling down to two candidates — Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich — who can't very well use "Obamacare" against the president, since they are solidly on record in support of the same — even more draconian, if you are inclined that way on the issue — health care solutions. /more/
  • Anger propels conservative Republicans

    January 30, 2012
    Interesting thesis by Thomas Edsall in the New York Times that blames Newt Gingrich's fall in the polls in Florida on his decision to step away from the far-right politics of anger — such as against mainstream media — that worked so well for him in South Carolina. /more/
  • Florida won't finish Gingrich

    January 29, 2012
    Polling indicates a broad consensus that Mitt Romney will finish comfortably ahead of Newt Gingrich in Florida primary voting (though not with 50 percent of the vote). /more/
  • The politics of presidential poundage

    January 26, 2012
    The Gingrich candidacy raises anew an old political issue — will voters choose a pudgy presidential contender over a thin man? Carl Cannon, for Real Clear Politics, writes that Ed Rollins teed this up squarely for Mike Huckabee in assessing another Huck race this year: As the 2012 Republican presidential field was assembling, veteran GOP political consultant Ed Rollins gathered the remnants of his crew together in hopes of reprising their 2008 campaign with the same candidate — Mike Huckabee. /more/
  • More »

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Bob Lancaster

  • Banned in 2018

    Here's some arcana reeking of 2017 that I'm banning from consideration, attention, even out-loud mention in 2018. I'm unfriending all this 2017-reminding shit. It's dead to me in 2018.
    • Jan 11, 2018
  • More »

Latest in Bob Lancaster

  • Lancaster retires

    Bob Lancaster, one of the Arkansas Times longest and most valued contributors, retired from writing his column last week. We’ll miss his his contributions mightily. Look out, in the weeks to come, for a look back at some of his greatest hits. In the meantime, here's a good place to start.

    • Feb 21, 2013
  • On black history

    If you're going to devote an entire month to appreciating the history of a color, it might as well be the color black.
    • Feb 14, 2013
  • Making it through

    Made it through another January, thank the Lord.
    • Feb 6, 2013
  • More »

Most Recent Comments


© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation