LarsJorgensen | Arkansas news, politics, opinion, restaurants, music, movies and art

Member since Apr 14, 2012

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.


  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »


Recent Comments

Re: “Back to the future with thorium

Colin, I accept that IFR is one possible way forward to meet the coming electricity demands but not that it is the only way. Both reactor technologies are past the first proof of concept phase but well short of being developed enough to understand their full economics. If coal is cheaper than nuclear then the vast majority of the world will choose coal - with all its downsides. Both LFTR and IFR should be funded through first of a kind full scale reactors so we can get a good handle on the cost and thoroughly vet the safety issues. I believe LFTR will come out lower cost and safer than IFR.
Breeding (producing more fissile than you consume) is not a critical capability so long as we can achieve iso-breeding (producing just as much fissile as you consume).

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by LarsJorgensen on 04/14/2012 at 6:42 PM
  • Re: Protest set on tax legislation

    • Stu/DullRazor, what about all those millionaires and billionaires getting much more something for nothing? The…

    • on November 20, 2017
  • Re: Protest set on tax legislation

    • Razor I must commend you for breaking the record in one post for multiple assumptions…

    • on November 20, 2017
  • Re: Protest set on tax legislation

    • Too bad they didnt show up when Asa was working to raise taxes.

    • on November 20, 2017


© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation