Let the people rule 

Let the people rule

Hurricanes like Katrina don't come every year, but they come often enough that potential victims are wise to plan for them. Electoral disasters like the 2000 presidential election don't happen every four years, either, but they've occurred with sufficient frequency to show that defensive measures are needed. Prudent citizens are preparing.

The Arkansas House of Representatives has approved and sent to the Senate a bill (HB 1339) to help assure that the American people are permitted to elect their president — all of the people, not just a handful of party regulars. A majority of the House believes that the world's oldest democracy should choose its leaders democratically, a proposition hard to argue with.

Hard for us, we should say, hard for most people, but not for the agitated elitists who resent the common man's having a say in the running of his country. The same sort who were against votes for blacks and women and young people, who believed that U.S. senators should be chosen by politicians rather than taxpayers, now oppose the National Popular Vote Bill.

If approved by a sufficient number of state legislatures, the bill would ensure that the presidential candidate who receives the most votes becomes president. In 2000, more Americans voted for Al Gore than voted for George W. Bush, but the quaint mechanics of the Electoral College gave Bush the presidency. You know the rest.

Throughout American history, some have wanted the states superior to the people. The country's bloodiest war was fought over this point, and the champions of people's rights won, though the states' righters still feign ignorance, if they don't already possess it. The head of the national Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, has ordered Republican legislators to resist the popular vote legislation. So we see Rep. Dan Greenberg of Little Rock taking one for the team, arguing in essence that to be pro-American is to be anti-Arkansan, the sort of embarrassing argument that Orval Faubus used to make. Rep. Davy Carter of Cabot shared with the House that his grandfather-in-law (Limbaugh?) sometimes knows what's best, and grandpapa opposes the Popular Vote Bill.

Although Rep. Mike Burris of Malvern, a non-Republican, thoughtfully explained what the legislation was really about — “one person, one vote” — the opposition remained determinedly unenlightened. After the bill passed, the Republican state chairman declared it “inconceivable” that a New Yorker's vote should count as much as an Arkansan's. He seemed nostalgic for the poll tax.

HB 1339 is now before the Senate State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Committee. Supporters should make sure the senators hear opinions other than Limbaugh's.



Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Redefining candidate quality

    Despite what national party organizations like the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the National Republican Campaign Committee say, conventional definitions of candidate quality are not leading to progressive wins in 2018.
  • Stormy shaming

    Can we talk about Stormy Daniels? More specifically, can we talk about how we talk about Stormy Daniels?
  • Trump and Comey

    In the Bizarro World of the Trump administration, it's only fitting that the president serves as publicity director for James Comey's big book tour. (In the old Superman comics, Bizarro World was an upside-down reality where wickedness was virtue and vice versa.) Supposedly, Trump's stomping around the White House and various golf courses red-faced with anger, emitting smoke from his ears.
  • Week That Was

    After the wildest week of the wildest presidency in history, the clouded future suddenly unfolds more clearly and, yes, nearer. That includes the end of the Trump presidency.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Stormy shaming

    • Ms. Daniels is a female version of Trump. Someone with a valuable talent for making…

    • on April 19, 2018
  • Re: Stormy shaming

    • I do not automatically have contempt for women who have careers built around selling sex…

    • on April 19, 2018
  • Re: Stormy shaming

    • And if new 15 minutes of fame celebrity is a fat, fast-food worker then she'd…

    • on April 18, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation