Listen carefully 

A coalition of religious groups used primary election day to jumpstart the campaign to put discrimination against gays and lesbians in the Arkansas Constitution. Coalition petitioners were at many polls to get signatures to put an amendment on the ballot to prohibit same-sex marriage. A state employee told me about her experience at Dunbar Middle School. "Two people walked up to me. The first words out of one of their mouths was, 'Would you like to sign a petition for a chance to vote for or against gay marriage.' I'm for gay marriage, so I thought, maybe I should sign it. Then I realized they were trying to hoodwink me." Indeed. The ballot measure offers no opportunity to vote for same-sex marriage. It offers only the opportunity to prohibit it. Arkansas law already prohibits same-sex marriage. The constitutional redundancy is intended to derail anyone who thinks the Constitution's promise of equal rights might cast some legal doubt on the statute. The amendment does more than ban same-sex marriage. It also prohibits giving the rights of marriage to any but married couples. That prohibition has implications for a range of issues - inheritance, health insurance, custody, property division - that can't yet be fully foreseen. It could harm more than gays by limiting the state's ability to adapt to the changing nature of families and domestic partnerships. Such big technicalities don't matter to those who believe their Bible condemns homosexuality. They want the state to punish those who practice otherwise. Bible or no Bible, at least a few of them are apparently willing to lie to get the job done. It is not only a lie to say this amendment is a vote for or against gay marriage. It might also be a crime. State law makes it a Class A misdemeanor - punishable by up to a year in jail - to knowingly and falsely misrepresent the effect of a ballot measure to get someone to sign a petition. A friend of the state employee was accosted by petitioners in North Little Rock. There, the pitch was that the amendment would "remove activist judges." The amendment would remove no judges. A state constitutional amendment would provide gay-bashers some momentary pleasure. But it won't change gay people's wiring. Nor will it change the growing tolerance of homosexuality, particularly among future old people. It also ignores federal case law, which says you can't target a group of people for discrimination on account of their group. (At least that was the law until George W. Bush started appointing federal judges.) In time, the state's effort to make second-class citizens of people who want only to establish loving families will go in history's garbage can. There, it will join the old racial segregation laws. Zealots waving Bibles helped pass those laws, too. In the meanwhile, if you're asked to sign one of these petitions, listen carefully. If you're told a lie, ask for the petitioner's name and address, just as he asked for yours. Then cheerfully inform him that, while he'll not be getting your name, the prosecutor will be getting his. And by all means assure him that it's the sin you hate, not the sinner.

From the ArkTimes store


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Study: Voter ID law likely helped Trump

    More evidence in the Washington Post that voter ID laws suppress votes, particularly among groups likely to vote Democratic. And the evidence is from Wisconsin, where a microscopic victory gave Donald Trump that state's electoral votes.
    • Sep 26, 2017
  • Two dead in Camden plane crash

    Two men were killed in a private plane crash last night at the Camden Airport. Both were National Guardsmen but were not on military duty at the time.
    • Sep 26, 2017
  • Charter school critic praises tough assessment of LR school progress since 1957

    Diane Ravitch, a powerful voice against the billionaires trying to replace an egalitarian public education system with a fractured system of winners and losers segregated by race and income in private or privately operated schools, is giving a shoutout to Barclay Key of Little Rock for his review of Little Rock 60 years after the school crisis.
    • Sep 26, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Bootstraps for me, not thee

    Mean spirit, hypocrisy and misinformation abound among the rump minority threatening to wreck state government rather than allow passage of the state Medicaid appropriation if it continues to include the Obamacare-funded expansion of health insurance coverage for working poor.
    • Apr 14, 2016
  • Trump: The Obama of 2016?

    Conner Eldridge, the Democratic challenger to incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. John Boozman, launched an assault on Boozman Monday morning rich with irony and opportunity.
    • May 5, 2016
  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Aid politics

    The still-unfolding catastrophe in Houston is, first, a human tragedy. But when politicians try to tell you that a time of enormous human tragedy is not a time to talk about politics, it likely means the politics are embarrassing to them.
    • Aug 31, 2017
  • Save the statues!

    The Democratic Party of Arkansas has called for relocation of Confederate monuments from public places, such as courthouse squares and the Capitol lawn, to history museums or private grounds.
    • Aug 24, 2017
  • Charter secret

    These are hard times for those who believe in traditional public schools, run by democratically elected representatives, open to all on equal terms.
    • Aug 17, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Sex on campus

    • Nobody is blaming the victim. There also isn't some sinister patriarchy going on, it is…

    • on September 25, 2017
  • Re: Sex on campus

    • I'm in my 50's. I don't think I know a single woman who HASN'T been…

    • on September 25, 2017
  • Re: Sex on campus

    • Here we see a "social scientist" who begins with an ad hominem argument, and then…

    • on September 24, 2017

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation