Favorite

LR’s sacred cow 

The city of Little Rock faces tough times. Revenue is down. City workers will be laid off next year. Many others won't see pay raises. City services will be reduced. Summer programs for kids are among the casualties.

One area of city spending is sacrosanct, however. The 2010 budget anticipates sending another $200,000 — same as last year — to the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce.

Former state legislator Robert Johnston, in a letter in this week's Times, says that allotment should be cut or eliminated. “Subsidizing a rich business organization that lobbies for narrow interests is not an appropriate use of city tax dollars at any time, much less as you are proposing to close Alert Centers, etc.”

Mayor Mark Stodola knows who he serves first. He couldn't get on TV fast enough to dispute Johnston's point of view, after it first appeared on our blog. Stodola lauded the chamber's work in economic development.

Little Rock isn't alone among Arkansas cities in being controlled politically by the business establishment. So it isn't alone in providing subsidies (socialized business development, you could call it) to private chambers of commerce. It's wrong wherever it occurs.

Taxpayers already pay for a well-financed state economic development agency. They need not pay more on the local level, particularly since it only further encourages regional cannibalism in development. It's also difficult, if not impossible, to follow the money when cities send it out to private organizations. Yes, Little Rock has a contract that specifies the services it receives from the Chamber for its $200,000. But that doesn't mean the chamber opens its file drawers to anyone who would like to audit the Chamber's supposed work.

Accountability isn't even the biggest problem. The big problem is, as Johnston notes, shipping taxpayer money to an organization that stands in opposition to so many things on which the people who provide the money disagree.

Check the chamber's website for its policy positions. For starters, it wants a permanent local source of taxpayer-financed economic development money. No FOI need apply, you may be sure.

The chamber brags about its opposition to legislation to make it easier for unions to organize. It staunchly opposes public employee unions, such as those the city has. It even opposes allowing those that exist to have union dues deducted from paychecks. I bet they'd approve a checkoff for the Chamber of Commerce.

The Chamber opposes a public option health insurance plan, which certainly enjoys majority support in Pulaski County. It meddled ruinously in a Little Rock School District election three years ago — primarily by endorsing an insulting, anti-union white man over a moderate black woman — thus supercharging an opposition movement with ill consequences.

It wants to limit the ability to sue for damages in court. It loves the state's punitive workers-comp system. It supports spending huge sums on infrastructure (because that keeps its big members at work), but its only pronouncements on taxes fall in the realm of tax breaks for major industry. The chamber DOES like our cheap immigrant workforce, so it doesn't support a mass movement to ship them all home. It isn't about compassion, trust me.

There's more, but you get the idea.

These are, of course, unsurprising viewpoints for a business lobby. They are entitled to hold and advocate them. But there's no reason to gouge taxes on groceries, jeans and other necessities out of working stiffs, the unemployed, the uninsured, the sick and the hungry so the Chamber can receive government subsidies to work against their interests.

 

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Bootstraps for me, not thee

    Mean spirit, hypocrisy and misinformation abound among the rump minority threatening to wreck state government rather than allow passage of the state Medicaid appropriation if it continues to include the Obamacare-funded expansion of health insurance coverage for working poor.
    • Apr 14, 2016
  • Trump: The Obama of 2016?

    Conner Eldridge, the Democratic challenger to incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. John Boozman, launched an assault on Boozman Monday morning rich with irony and opportunity.
    • May 5, 2016
  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017

Most Shared

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Caution: government at work

    I have several government targets this week.
    • Oct 19, 2017
  • Pork barrel III

    Mike Wilson, the Jacksonville lawyer and former state representative, for the third time last week won a victory for the Arkansas Constitution and taxpayers and set back pork barreling.
    • Oct 12, 2017
  • Fishy lawmaking

    Last week, the legislature decided not to press a fight that could have further upended a balance of power in Arkansas already tilted too far in favor of the legislative branch.
    • Oct 5, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

October

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The casting couch

    • sigh............ I would argue that the idea of 'freedom from fear' is part of the…

    • on October 19, 2017
  • Re: Caution: government at work

    • As to the AR Chamber of Commerce-DO NOT FORGET it supports passage of SJR8, which…

    • on October 19, 2017
  • Re: The casting couch

    • Freedom from fear is a human right.

    • on October 19, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation