Favorite

Max’s law 

It's safe to predict that the Arkansas Senate will follow the House's lead and complete action this week on a bill that will close the records of concealed weapon permit holders.

Blame me for a law that will make government less accountable.

This story has mostly played out on the Internet, but to recap: In mid-February, following the lead of The Commercial Appeal in Memphis, I requested the permit list from the Arkansas State Police. It is public record.

I posted the list on-line on our Arkansas Blog, exactly as it is carried by the State Police and exactly as it has been provided to many others — including gun groups seeking mailing lists.

Controversy erupted here as it had in Memphis. Responding to fears about the publication of specific addresses, I took the list off the web. But, by then, the secrecy legislation was on an express track.

Emotion trumped reason. It's a significant privilege to be allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public. Experience in other states shows that the qualification procedures and ongoing checks for disqualifying acts by permit holders are not always foolproof. Criminals sometimes get or keep permits. Some people who hold permits should not. I received at least four specific death threats from people who said they held permits. One permit holder, who identified himself by name, said he didn't want me killed, but said a baseball bat beating was in order. I received dozens of other menacing calls and e-mails directed at me, my business, my family and even, in one case, my dog.

Logic was in short supply. The permit holders who identified themselves to me were also registered voters. Thus, personal information about them was already available on-line. Permit holders repeatedly said public knowledge of their carry permits made them less secure. I thought carry permits were supposed to bring greater security. I also don't understand the argument that a criminal is more likely to target someone who has demonstrated proficiency in gun use. Many permit holders also believed there was implicit ridicule in a public listing of their names.

Legislators swallowed a tale told by Rep. Randy Stewart, the secrecy bill's sponsor and a gun instructor. He suggested a relationship between the list's publication and a gun stolen from a gun permit holder's vehicle several days later. The list, needless to say, doesn't specify where permit holders keep their weapons or what type of vehicles they drive. In my neighborhood, leaving anything of value in a car — much less a gun — is invitation to theft.

Bloodied, I'm unbowed in the belief that there's a public interest in permit holders, a state regulated activity. The public knowledge also serves as a check on the gatekeepers. Just this week, the State Police learned from me that the list included a man arrested on a federal charge of possessing unregistered grenades. Such public checks are now to be lost. My fault, but probably inevitable. Nearly half the states seal these records rather than incur the gun lobby's wrath.

Fear, suspicion and even paranoia ran deep among the angriest callers. They highly prize secrecy of armed movement among us. Sadly they were misinformed, along with gun instructor Stewart. He was simply wrong when he said the law provides an expectation of secrecy for public records.

I'll say this about fear. I never had much until I got crosswise with some concealed weapon fanatics.

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • The Arkansas swamp

    The Arkansas Capitol is a fetid swamp of corruption and the bipartisan lack of concern tells you plenty.
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • That isn't what I said, and you know that pretty well, Oaf. Just lies and…

    • on June 23, 2018
  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • Rabbi, you probably don't know Steven. He's the head Kool-Aid taster for the Trump cult…

    • on June 22, 2018
  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • Those traits sound like most any politician in DC, mostly the Dims.

    • on June 22, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation