No Gingrich, no scorched earth 

It is beginning to look like we will not have in 2012 one of those rare presidential races where the icons of the great tectonic movements in politics face off at Armageddon.

That would be a race between President Obama and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the architect of national paralysis.

William Jennings Bryan and William Howard Taft gave the country such a race in 1896, and Barry Goldwater and Lyndon B. Johnson another but lesser one in 1964. It is time for another although it is not clear whether for the country it would be a blessing or a curse. The record is mixed.

Bryan, the great Christian commoner, cast out the bourbons who had led the Democratic Party since before the Civil War and led workers, dirt farmers and the downtrodden against the elites of business, agriculture, the professions and the goldbugs of finance, represented by McKinley. The Republicans would control the White House and Congress for all but eight of the next 36 years, and after Bryan's defeats politics would always thereafter be waged inside the confines of capitalist ardor, even during the era of Roosevelt and Truman.

Goldwater and Johnson represented polar extremes, pure laissez-faire conservatism and government activism. Johnson's lopsided victory produced the greatest advances in the liberal democratic tradition since Roosevelt's first term.

Gingrich, like Obama, casts himself as a transformational figure — Gingrich with better cause. He really did recast American politics in the half-dozen years leading up to his four years as the boss of a Republican House before his party exiled him in 1998.

Gingrich brought the scorched-earth strategy to Washington politics, and the changes he wrought in how Republicans conducted campaigns spread across the country and down to courthouse and ward elections. He said if the Republicans were going to take over they had to be ruthless. Democrats were not to be treated as political adversaries but as enemies of the United States and of "normal people."

Video and audio tapes and campaign booklets went out to Republican candidates everywhere about how to wage campaigns.

"Language matters," Gingrich's tapes said. Candidates should learn to "speak like Newt." There were words, tested by focus groups, that they should use against Democratic opponents, whoever they were, because the words always aroused strong emotions, the principal one being hatred. They were to memorize and use words like traitor, corrupt, radical, socialist, failure, destructive, decay, incompetent, disgraceful, criminal, cheat, steal, shame, bosses, abuse of power and pathetic.

Gingrich had used such words in the House and brought down the Democratic speaker, Texan Jim Wright. And they proved increasingly effective as acolytes used them and the other Gopac strategies to get elected. The big one was the campaign of 1994, when Gingrich led the Republicans to a takeover of the U.S. House, which then installed him as speaker.

Washington changed dramatically in that decade and it has never looked back. Civility and cooperation, the latter rarely in great supply, disappeared. The new toxic climate drove a few men — Arkansas Sens. David Pryor and Dale Bumpers, for example — to retire from office.

Bob Michel, the gallant Republican leader of the 1980s, was forced out by Gingrich. Michel, now 88, recalled the other day that he had advised Gingrich he should not treat Democrats as enemies but as political adversaries only with different and worse ideas. The war mentality will turn around to bite you someday, he told Gingrich. Sure enough, Democrats launched ethics charges against him in abundance, which ended with the House, in a bipartisan vote, fining and rebuking him, the only time in history a House speaker has been reprimanded.

Mickey Edwards, the former Republican congressman from Oklahoma who enjoyed a leadership role with Gingrich, explained Gingrich's legacy last month.

"Government is dysfunctional because the presidency and Congress no longer have the ability to compromise, and I put Newt at the heart of that," Edwards said. Part of that is Gingrich's policy, now that of his party, of calling Democrats unpatriotic, people who are out to do in the United States.

It might be cleansing to have a presidential election fought out on the terms of the Gingrich/Republican philosophy. I think it would turn out all right, but it's better that we don't find out.


Speaking of...

  • Q: How low can they go? UPDATE

    August 24, 2018
    Republicans rush to make political hay of death of Iowa college student. Her family takes a different approach. /more/
  • In Praise of Newt Gingrich open line

    August 14, 2013
    The line is open. Final words: * NEWT GINGRICH GETS IT RIGHT: How about this? /more/
  • Mike Huckabee said something stupid again

    February 22, 2013
    On his radio show today on this George Washington's birthday, Mike Huckabee and Newt Gingrich spent some time comparing President Obama and our first president. /more/
  • Guns for everyone

    April 25, 2012
    When he wasn't at the St. Louis zoo getting bit by a penguin last week, Newt Gingrich was across town berating the National Rifle Association for being too timid in its advocacy of gun ownership and gun use. /more/
  • Newt Gingrich's blow for adulter.., er, polyamory

    February 5, 2012
    I tend to think this is one of those bogus New York Times trend stories, but the feature writer still did dig up some people that revelations about Newt Gingrich's desire for an "open marriage" back in the days when he was boinking Callista while married to another has done wonders for those who think "polyamory" is hunkydory. /more/
  • Beau geste

    February 1, 2012
    the person who slew a Democratic activist's cat in Russellville a staunch Republican? Is he an actual or potential serial killer of humans as well as house pets? (Most serial killers seem to start out on animals.) Or is he both Republican and serial killer, like Ted Bundy, who was Mr. Young Republican by day while strangling coeds at night? At this point, we don't know for sure. The investigation is ongoing. /more/
  • Obamacare (Romneycare) off the table

    February 1, 2012
    Poor Rick Santorum could only shrug in frustration when he complained in the Florida debate about the supreme irony of the 2012 presidential race: Republicans made President Obama vulnerable two years ago by demonizing his health-insurance reforms and now they are about to nominate one of two men who cannot effectively use the issue against him. /more/
  • Republicans' choice: champions of 'Obamacare'

    January 31, 2012
    Rick Santorum is right, for once, Ernie Dumas writes this week. He says the race for the Republican nomination is boiling down to two candidates — Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich — who can't very well use "Obamacare" against the president, since they are solidly on record in support of the same — even more draconian, if you are inclined that way on the issue — health care solutions. /more/
  • Anger propels conservative Republicans

    January 30, 2012
    Interesting thesis by Thomas Edsall in the New York Times that blames Newt Gingrich's fall in the polls in Florida on his decision to step away from the far-right politics of anger — such as against mainstream media — that worked so well for him in South Carolina. /more/
  • Florida won't finish Gingrich

    January 29, 2012
    Polling indicates a broad consensus that Mitt Romney will finish comfortably ahead of Newt Gingrich in Florida primary voting (though not with 50 percent of the vote). /more/
  • More »


Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Attacked

    Courtney Goodson won her race to stay on the state Supreme Court last week with something to spare, in spite of the unprecedented sludge of dark-money ads that tried to persuade people that she was an execrable wench who was capable of almost anything.
    • Nov 15, 2018
  • The legacy of the 1992 'Save the River Parks' campaign

    If not for an unlikely assortment of activists, lawyers and a poultry magnate, a highway in Riverdale would have prevented the Big Dam Bridge from being built.
    • Oct 18, 2018
  • Such good news

    Health care has moved to the top of people's concerns this election year even as the "good" news keeps coming. The question is, how much more good news can people stand?
    • Oct 18, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Attacked

    Courtney Goodson won her race to stay on the state Supreme Court last week with something to spare, in spite of the unprecedented sludge of dark-money ads that tried to persuade people that she was an execrable wench who was capable of almost anything.
    • Nov 15, 2018
  • Such good news

    Health care has moved to the top of people's concerns this election year even as the "good" news keeps coming. The question is, how much more good news can people stand?
    • Oct 18, 2018
  • No courage

    Political courage — doing what needs to be done even if it is not wildly popular — is a vanishing commodity.
    • Oct 11, 2018
  • More »

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation