Now what? 

Little Rock elementary teachers spoke decisively last week on a proposal to test “merit pay” in the Little Rock School District.

They voted 256 to 42 against the plan to select 50 classroom teachers by lot to compete for bonuses offered by the Walton family for increases in student test scores over the course of a school year.

Can we now agree that Little Rock teachers are not solely motivated by money?

Can we now agree that top-down administration is no more popular than it ever has been? Maybe not. Even in the aftermath of repudiation, Superintendent Roy Brooks said he wouldn’t rule out pushing for this identical idea again.

Can we now agree that it was a bad idea for private parties with no links to the Little Rock public schools, including children, to secretly try to influence policy with money (Democrat-Gazette publisher Walter Hussman) or a slick public relations effort (the source of this money is still a secret, thanks to the Arkansas Community Foundation, which laundered the $15,000 donation.)

Can we now agree that the “genius” behind the PR offensive insulted teachers by suggesting that a vote for the untested idea might be worth some new furniture?

Can we now agree that teachers resented being ordered to attend mandatory meetings to hear the PR pitch?
Can we agree that the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page didn’t influence Little Rock school teachers, except negatively, by deriding them?

Now some things that the other side of this divide might consider:
Can we agree that the Little Rock School Board, perhaps a majority, is unhappy with the Classroom Teachers Association?

Can we agree that the public is owed every assurance that incompetent teachers may be removed from classrooms in a clear, expeditious and constitutional process by competent principals?
Can we agree that talk of alternative forms of compensation isn’t likely to go away?

Can we agree that alternative compensation is worth considering, as long as the idea is not dictated by an administrator (or worse, purchased by outsiders with animus toward public schools.)

Can we agree that a consensus pay plan, such as the one developed by teachers and administrators in Denver, where test scores are but one element of the bonus formula, might be worth considering?

The prospect of teacher-administration cooperation seems bleak. Negotiations are supposed to begin soon on a new teacher contract. The district will be looking for give-backs. (Noted: even if a majority vote, rather than 75 percent, would have been sufficient under the contract for the merit pay experiment, it still would have failed miserably.) I suspect some board members want more than givebacks. They’d prefer an end to recognition of the Classroom Teachers Association.

North Little Rock locked out the teachers union several years ago. It was led, coincidentally, by a board member who is a top official at Hussman’s newspaper. Left with a choice of preserving their livelihoods or walking out, teachers there chose their livelihoods. In the long run, whatever the short-term solidarity of Little Rock teachers, economic forces would likely prevail here, too. The board would remove an irritant, but poison relationships with teachers for years to come.

What the Little Rock School District needs is a peacemaker, a local equivalent of Bill Clinton. Otherwise, last week’s vote will be only another bruising round in a nonproductive fight.


From the ArkTimes store


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Bootstraps for me, not thee

    Mean spirit, hypocrisy and misinformation abound among the rump minority threatening to wreck state government rather than allow passage of the state Medicaid appropriation if it continues to include the Obamacare-funded expansion of health insurance coverage for working poor.
    • Apr 14, 2016
  • Trump: The Obama of 2016?

    Conner Eldridge, the Democratic challenger to incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. John Boozman, launched an assault on Boozman Monday morning rich with irony and opportunity.
    • May 5, 2016
  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017

Most Shared

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Pork barrel III

    Mike Wilson, the Jacksonville lawyer and former state representative, for the third time last week won a victory for the Arkansas Constitution and taxpayers and set back pork barreling.
    • Oct 12, 2017
  • Fishy lawmaking

    Last week, the legislature decided not to press a fight that could have further upended a balance of power in Arkansas already tilted too far in favor of the legislative branch.
    • Oct 5, 2017
  • LR Central at 70

    The city of Little Rock has finished its "Reflections on Progress" observance of the 60th anniversary of the desegregation of Central High School and the people most affected managed to put well-placed asterisks on the notion that this was a story all about racial progress.
    • Sep 28, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Trust and obey

    • A very timely and beautifully written piece. Indeed, the whole frightening paradigm is about preserving…

    • on October 15, 2017
  • Re: Trust and obey

    • Anyone else ponder how many times donald trump, playboy for five-decades, may have paid for/insisted…

    • on October 14, 2017
  • Re: Conspiracy theories

    • Here's the business end of the Politifact article cited above by Vanessa: "Newsweek's claim is…

    • on October 14, 2017

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation