Favorite

Occupy's rights violated 

Occupy's rights violated

I have watched with interest the reaction of LR city government to the Occupy Movement in general and particularly the treatment of OLR in recent weeks. The motivation for evicting the OLR protesters from their downtown encampment as articulated by City Director Lance Hines is their association with what Hines considers a "Revolutionary Anarchist" movement informed by Saul Alinsky's writing.

It is my profound hope that I am not the only person deeply disturbed by this horrifying move by city government. Peaceful protesters disallowed from gathering in protest because of the content of their beliefs. Yes, they were camped on city property but they were there with the blessing of city government. It is only when they became a potential political liability during Riverfest that their presence became problematic to the power structure of the city.

The implication that OWS and OLR protesters are somehow dangerous or, to use Mr. Hines language, "revolutionary," is questionable. He may not agree with their point of view and they may oppose what he stands for politically, but there have been no indications that this small group of protesters posed a clear and present danger to the governance of the city much less the nation. Mr. Hines' justification to break up the protesters is the very means used by the likes of Bull Connor and Orval Faubus to break up NAACP and SCLC protesters half a century ago. We have reached a dangerous point in our political culture when opposition to those in power is deemed criminal or subversive. At what point will the power structure of this city stop their silencing of opposition?

What other forms of gathering and protest will be disallowed by this city government? Will a preacher who dares to speak out against the neglect of our urban core or a neighborhood association board member who speaks out against seizure of their home for the new tech park find themselves facing the full force of City Hall? Where is the line for Mssrs. Hines and Stodola? What is the litmus test for what is and what is not radical, revolutionary or subversive? Is our city government so weak and its vision so shallow that it cannot withstand citizen protest?

There are some principles of the OWS and by extension OLR movements with which I sympathize. There are some I do not share. Agree or not, what I cannot do is remain silent when a citizen's right to assemble, speak and petition his or her government is silenced simply because that government does not like what it hears. Mssrs. Hines and Stodola should be ashamed of their actions in the treatment of OLR.  As a citizen and taxpayer, I am certainly ashamed of them.

The Reverend

Dr. Robert Wm. Lowry

Little Rock

From the web

In response to the Arkansas Blog's reporting on Riverfest workers disallowing persons from gathering signatures on ballot initiative petitions:

I don't understand why the Riverfest folks would want to keep the ballot initiative folks out. Why not rent booth space within the festival grounds to the petition groups? There are thousands of Arkansans who support their issues and would seek them out in order to get a chance to vote on the proposals in November. If you missed a chance to sign a petition on the medical marijuana issue, their website (arcompassion.org) lists businesses around the state where you can sign their petition, and I suppose some of the other issue websites do as well. There are only six more weeks left to get the needed signatures.

Mystery shopper

It is odd that hateful demonstrators at a private funeral cannot be arrested, but police dutifully threaten petitioners at a public event on public grounds at the behest of a private entity. Constitutional rights are auctioned off to the highest bidder.

Petitioning has been a part of the American political process since before the American Revolution (for the Faux News acolytes, that was more than 200 years ago). Certainly, by now there should not be any confusion over where petitioning can be done.

But considering the anti-civil liberties attitude of many tea-bagger elected officials, clarification needs to be made. Free speech and petitioning disputes have been litigated over and over again. Federal, state, and municipal attorneys should be well aware of the precedents, but choose to ignore them.

Maybe a state legislator will request that the state Attorney-General compile a comprehensive guide about free speech rights to be disseminated to all elected officials — not that they will read it.

Yossarian Minderbinder

Submit letters to the Editor, Arkansas Times, P.O. Box 34010, Little Rock, AR 72203. We also accept letters via e-mail. The address is arktimes@arktimes.com. We also accept faxes at 375-3623. Please include name and hometown.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Outsourcing state government

    As a citizen, I don't get to choose not to pay taxes because I don't like what the Arkansas state government is spending state and federal money on, such as paying a Chinese company, Sun Paper, approximately $1 billion to build a paper mill in Clark County.
    • Sep 22, 2016
  • Radical Zinn

    Re: the bill to remove Howard Zinn books from school libraries: When "alternative" books are removed from school libraries and class curriculums, it is the beginning of broader suppression of education and civilian participation in politics, not the end of it.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • On Walmart and state money

    No they don't need state help. Any conservative legislator who is true to their tea party principles will crow on about crony capitalism. I look forward to deafening silence.
    • Sep 21, 2017

Most Shared

  • Discussion: State killing of the mentally ill

    The Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and others will have a forum on mental illness and the death penalty at 6:30 p.m. Monday at the Bowen School of Law's Friday Courtroom.

Latest in Letters

  • In response to the Oct. 16 Arkansas Blog post "UA Little Rock picks firm to study football"

    I guess UALR has money to waste. This study will probably conclude with the same results the 30 Crossing [study] did, i.e. this is a "have to" idea.
    • Oct 19, 2017
  • If not now, then when?

    I remember asking that question after 20 children were murdered at Sandy Hook. Surely, this tragedy would wake us up--get us working to end our gun violence epidemic.
    • Oct 12, 2017
  • Mena memories

    Not sure of the exact time, but back then a county deputy (later a drug task force officer) told me he'd been on a mountaintop near the Polk County line when a large twin-engine aircraft flew over so low that he threw himself on the ground to avoid the propellers.
    • Oct 5, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

October

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Profile of a plant

    • For the past 20 years I had been taking allergy shots and they had helped…

    • on October 23, 2017
  • Re: 'Every day was a Tuesday'

    • Perceptions of being affected by Tuberculosis (TB) Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by the…

    • on October 22, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation