Of slavery and Reagan 

Two feel-good resolutions praising modern presidents, one conceptually factual and the other mostly baloney, popped up in the Arkansas legislature in the last week with decidedly different fates.

Lawmakers stymied the factual one and, if previous votes are a guide, the fanciful one will be adopted without a demurrer. That usually happens when history is used in the service of political posturing. These memorials, which are adopted by the dozen at every legislative session, are ordinarily victimless documents, if you don't count the truth and the state's reputation.

Rep. Stephanie Flowers filed a resolution congratulating President Barack Obama for his historic victory, but it was killed in a committee after Republicans objected to a phrase referring to the United States as a “nation founded by slave owners” because, they said, some founders were not slaveholders. Flowers resurrected the tribute by deleting mention of slave owners and substituting “a country whose history includes the shame of slavery,” a phrase to which the Republicans cannot find a nuanced objection.

The eight Republican senators followed with a resolution declaring Friday “Ronald Reagan Day” in Arkansas. It credits him with ending the Cold War, dismantling the Soviet Union, restoring accountability and common sense to government, producing unprecedented economic expansion and opportunities for millions of people and lowering crime and drug use across the country. Though all those lofty claims are largely at odds with history, I will be shocked if they get flyspecked before the ritual vote to adopt the resolution.

Let's look at the facts behind all those claims.

Flowers' mention of a nation founded by slave owners earned her a rebuke from the Democrat Gazette for resurrecting racism. The paper said she airbrushed out founders like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin, who condemned slavery. That was true but each man owned slaves until his death. Flowers didn't say “a nation founded by slavery lovers.” Franklin willed the freedom of one of his slaves upon his death but then outlived him. Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, owned up to 223 slaves and never gave them up.

Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration of Independence condemned King George for promoting the slave trade, but the Second Continental Congress took it out because Southern representatives objected — Northerners, too, owing to financial interests in the slave trade.

But were the delegates who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who signed the Constitution slave owners? Studies have never settled on exactly how many owned slaves at the time but they usually fixed the number at between 17 and 24 of the 55 independence signatories and more than a third of those who voted for the Constitution and obviously many more who did not want to disturb the issue for political reasons: Half the states would have backed out. James Madison's copious notes on the slavery debates in the Convention give you a good idea of where people stood.

The Constitution they adopted enshrined slavery and set the nation on a course toward civil war, where arms finally settled the issue. It counted a slave as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of fixing representation in Congress (Northerners did not want them counted as humans at all). It prohibited Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least 20 years, placed a tax of up to $10 on the importation of slaves and required states to return runaway slaves to their masters “on demand” without emancipation. You judge. Were Flowers' words too casual?

What about the boasts for Reagan?

Accountability? He tripled the national debt. A lower crime rate? It went down for four years and then soared to new records and then declined steadily for eight years under Bill Clinton (the whole trend reflected a declining population in the crime-prone age group). The economy? The Reagan years produced two recessions and 18 million new jobs, 4 million fewer than the Clinton years, but fantastic compared with George W. Bush.

Ending the Cold War and dismantling the Soviet empire? Most historians credit Mikhail Gorbachev.

The premise of the Reagan hagiographies is that his military spending, tough talk and threats to build a nuclear missile shield worried Gorbachev so much that he broke up the communist empire. The Republican resolution said he built the military “to win the Cold War.” Actually, the military never fired a shot at a communist unless you count the Marxist militia in Grenada.

Minutes of the Politburo, which surfaced in the 1990s, have caused historians to give Reagan a little more credit for the Soviet demolition, but for directly opposite reasons. They show that Gorbachev and Politburo members considered Reagan's missile shield stupid, as it proved in practice, but Gorbachev did not want to get into an arms race. He wanted to disarm and went to the summit with Reagan at Reykjavik to get him to agree to a 50 percent reduction in nuclear arsenals. He (and Reagan's advisers) were shocked when the president proposed scrapping all nuclear weapons and developing and sharing the missile shield with Russia.

Politburo minutes and his own recollections suggest that though the summit fell apart Gorbachev returned convinced that Reagan would never launch a strike against the Soviet Union and sincerely wanted to eliminate all nuclear weapons and so it was perfectly safe to continue glasnost and perestroika — the radical economic reforms, expansion of personal freedoms, defense cuts and transformation of relations with the satellite nations and the West.

It was not Reagan the hawk but Reagan the pacifist who gave Gorbachev his cue.

Tweak the resolution and pass it. Give the man his day.




Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Tax 'relief'

    Stormy Daniels, North Korea and malicious Russians all belong on the back burner. The big political game to watch, because it moves the odds at this year's national elections and affects your wallet, is still the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that Republicans passed in December.
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • Gun history

    It all seems so urgent yet so pointless, this umpteenth national catharsis over gun slaughter: children and parents wailing for action by Congress and legislatures, followed by hesitant and often laughable ideas from the president and others about how to stop it.
    • Mar 1, 2018
  • Conley's plea

    Even with his facial stubble, Garrard Conley looks and acts like a diffident teenager, not a 33-year-old man who is a leading exponent of the "gay agenda," as right-wingers refer to the movement to gain equal treatment for sexual minorities.
    • Feb 15, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Dollars and degrees

    Governor Hutchinson says a high graduation rate (ours is about the lowest) and a larger quotient of college graduates in the population are critical to economic development. Every few months there is another, but old, key to unlocking growth.
    • Aug 25, 2016
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Deja vu re Trump

    For a couple of million Arkansawyers, this fabulous circus of Russians, Trump, Mueller and Stormy is approaching deja vu.

    • Mar 22, 2018
  • Tax 'relief'

    Stormy Daniels, North Korea and malicious Russians all belong on the back burner. The big political game to watch, because it moves the odds at this year's national elections and affects your wallet, is still the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that Republicans passed in December.
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • WWJD?

    Jesus found something blessed about poor people, even promising them the kingdom of God, and he was always admonishing his disciples to feed and tend to them when they were sick. He reviled the rich and the uncharitable.
    • Mar 8, 2018
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Most Viewed

  • Hitting students

    A friend once joked that I love Arkansas so much that if they ever cut me open, they'll find an Arkansas-shaped heart beating inside my chest. It's true. But just as the state was beginning to show off her spring beauty last week, I was reminded of what a dark and imperfect place Arkansas can be.
  • Silence is golden

    Hillary Clinton has been the target of gratuitously negative coverage from the national political press for as long as she's been in public life. During Bill Clinton's presidency, rumors of her impending criminal indictment were a regular feature of "Whitewater" coverage almost until that media-created pseudo-scandal fizzled out altogether.

  • Are you being served?

    These aren't good times for confidence in public servants.

  • Deja vu re Trump

    For a couple of million Arkansawyers, this fabulous circus of Russians, Trump, Mueller and Stormy is approaching deja vu.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Hitting students

    • Well written piece. AR family-serving professional organizations such as teachers, pediatricians, and mental health organizations…

    • on March 22, 2018
  • Re: Silence is golden

    • Spot on. In an election where 6 points is a landslide politicians cannot dismiss any…

    • on March 22, 2018
  • Re: Silence is golden

    • Living in New Jersey, is see first hand how those in the Northeast view Southerners…

    • on March 22, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation