Asa Hutchinson is passionately partisan, but hates to admit it. When he participated in the impeachment of a popularly elected Democratic president, he didn’t mention that Republican Party leaders chose him for the job because they knew he wouldn’t vary from the party line, and because he represented a safely Republican district and need not fear political reprisal. To hear Hutchinson tell it, his was a case over patriotism over party, his political career endangered by his serving as a prosecutor.

He’s practicing the same sort of deception in regard to the minimum wage. Depending on how the political winds were blowing, he has over the years voted for an increase (sort of) and against an increase, said he was for an increase and said he was against it. The only thing consistent about Hutchinson’s position is his steadfast refusal to come clean. The one time he voted for a minimum wage bill in Congress, it was because features had been added to the bill, such as tax cuts for the rich, to assure that low-income workers would not be the only beneficiaries. Hutchinson is no longer a member of Congress, but the Republican leadership continues to use the same strategy, supporting a mini-mum wage increase only if it’s accompanied by gifts to big corporations and heirs to vast fortunes. The U.S. Senate rejected such deception last week.

Unkindest cut

Republican attorney general candidate Gunner DeLay promised that he would take off the gloves in his race with Democratic candidate Dustin McDaniel, and he wasn’t bluffing. Last week, DeLay accused McDaniel of not being a judicial money-grubber. If true, this could cost McDaniel his license, or at least the respect of his peers.

According to DeLay, McDaniel’s 1998 participation in a lawsuit against a gun manufacturer was “political,” McDaniel’s chance of sharing in a huge verdict hardly considered at all. Only a demented person would suggest that an Arkansas politician could gain support by being on the anti-side of a gun lawsuit, so when DeLay says that McDaniel’s action was “political … about restricting people’s right to bear arms” he suggests that McDaniel was after neither money nor votes, but motivated solely by idealism. This would breach the lawyers’ code: “No representation without generous compensation.”

The idea of a lawyer acting from conviction rather than cash is, DeLay said, “far out of the mainstream of Arkansas values.” McDaniel denied that he had been influenced by principle in his actions as a lawyer. By the end of the week, it appeared both men were committed to keeping morality out of the courtroom, so this should cease to be an issue.



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Arkansas Times Staff

  • Friday's headlines and your holiday open line

    What happened at the State Board of Education and what does it mean; Legislation filed for Hutchinson's government reorganization plan; Pediatric flu-related death in Arkansas reported; Suspect arrested in unsolved 2008 North Little Rock homicide.
    • Dec 21, 2018
  • New episode of Rock the Culture: "Juice In Your Own Life"

    In this week’s episode, Charles and Antwan provide perspective and conversation on the Little Rock Mayoral Election and State Board of Education’s consideration of the anticipated request to waive the Fair Teacher Dismissal Act. In addition, Charles and Antwan discuss all things happening in the Little Rock School District with Superintendent Michael Poore.
    • Dec 11, 2018
  • End of the week headlines and your open line

    Alderman candidate misses chance to cast deciding vote for himself in runoff election; Dem-Gaz to phase out print delivery in El Dorado, Camden and Magnolia; Rapert threatens UA Fort Smith over 'Drag Queen Story Time' event; The Van seeks to raise $35,000 in three weeks for new warehouse facility in South Little Rock.
    • Dec 7, 2018
  • More »

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Of Freud and foolishness

    I’ve been suspicious of psychologists bearing theories ever since my graduate school "Eureka!" about Freud and Dostoyevsky.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Perhaps, dss, the relevant data is found in the types of jobs held by men…

    • on January 16, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Wondering what my name would be if not for Jonathan Swift. Probably Pamela.

    • on January 15, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • i would not necessarily regard this correlation as evidence of 'toxic' effects, but some years…

    • on January 15, 2019

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation