Paying to look at public records 

Should Internet fees be allowed?

click to enlarge FREE AT COURTHOUSE: But inspecting public records will cost you in some counties.
  • FREE AT COURTHOUSE: But inspecting public records will cost you in some counties.

Some circuit clerks are charging a fee to inspect public records online, and some people are upset about it, believing it contradicts the spirit of the state Freedom of Information law. Clerks who're charging say that without the fee, there'd be no records online for the public to inspect.

No clerk charges a fee to look at public records in the clerk's own office. The FOI forbids that. (Although the law does permit a small fee for copies, to cover the cost.) Some clerks don't charge for online inspection, either. The circuit clerk in Pulaski County, the largest county in the state, doesn't. The circuit clerk in Stone County doesn't charge for online inspection, but that's because Stone County, one of the smaller counties, doesn't have records online. To look at records in Stone County, a person has to go to the courthouse in Mountain View.

Van Buren County is small also, and it has online records. Unlimited access to the records costs $135 a month. Alternatively, one can pay $4 per viewed image.

Van Buren Circuit/County Clerk Ester Bass of Clinton said that when he took office in 2001, only five years' worth of county records were digitized. "We had a small room with one viewer," he said. "People were lined up to use it. Some of them were mad." To digitize the rest of the records cost $110,000, a sum difficult for Van Buren County government to come up with. So fees are charged. "It'll take a long time to pay back what we spent," Bass said. "We don't have that many subscribers right now. It's mostly people doing title work for oil and gas leases. We're right in the heart of the Fayetteville Shale."

Bette Stamps of Fayetteville, Washington County circuit clerk, said the office began digitizing records around 2002, and, "We have always charged an Internet fee." There's a cost to maintaining the system, she said.

"The FOI says we have to provide public access for free, and we do that," Stamps said. "If people want to come into our office, they can use our computers for free. We have a monthly fee of $50 for people who want to sit in their offices and look at the records."

Tom Larimer, executive director of the Arkansas Press Association, said he hadn't heard about counties charging Internet fees for public records, but he knew that discussions were ongoing about how Internet records should be handled. "FOI doesn't specifically address the question of online records because the Internet didn't exist when the law was passed."

Larimer said he'd be surprised if the Arkansas Supreme Court allowed charges just to look at records online. "That would be discouraging access rather than encouraging it, which is the idea of FOI."

Donna Wilson, circuit clerk in Stone County, is president of the circuit clerks association. She said the association hadn't addressed the question of how online records should be handled.


From the ArkTimes store

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

More by Doug Smith

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Eligible voters removed from rolls

    Arkansas Times reporters contacted election officials around the state to see how they had handled flawed felon data from the secretary of state. Responses varied dramatically.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Real Republicans don't do pre-K

    Also, drifting away from trump, Hudson's downfall at ASU and more.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Asa on pre-K

    • Aug 17, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Arkansas Reporter

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Inconsequential News Quiz: I (Heart) Dick Edition

    • The author is just a crybaby. I declared my gun store a Muslim Free Zone…

    • on January 18, 2018
  • Re: Arkansans of the Year: Women

    • Great article and reporting, as always by Ms. Peacock, who covered a lot of energetic…

    • on January 18, 2018
  • Re: 'Lock up last'

    • Mr. Hardy, thank you so much for this great article. You present opposite views and…

    • on January 18, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation