Favorite

Perception 

Last week, the Attorney General certified a ballot initiative to increase the Arkansas minimum wage from $6.25 to $8.50 over a three-year period. If polls are any indication, the group behind the worthy measure shouldn't have trouble gathering the necessary 62,000 signatures required to place the measure before voters this November — some 72 percent of respondents last summer said they believed raising the minimum wage was "just the right thing to do," according to the public employee union AFSCME.

When that same survey asked Arkansans if they would be more or less likely to support a candidate who voted for the Affordable Care Act, 55 percent said "less likely." It's not surprising that Arkansans who reflexively hate Obama also heap scorn on Obamacare. But a good number of those same red-tinted voters also support a minimum wage hike. Why?

Public suspicion about the ACA is not unreasonable, especially after the embarrassing caricature of flailing governmental incompetence that accompanied the Healthcare.gov rollout last fall. Although the problems with the federal site are now largely fixed, Obamacare remains an unproven program.

But the real fuel for conservative animosity, as evidenced by a safari into the comments section of any online article about the ACA, isn't about the functionality of the program. It's about handouts, or the idea thereof. It's the image of an outstretched palm (maybe a brown one) grasping for a slice of tax revenue. People don't like the idea of paying workers below a living wage for the same reason they don't like the idea of giving away health care: It insults their sense of justice.

Regardless of ideological affiliation, the majority of America feels deeply that the existing order of things is unfair, that labor and effort have come uncoupled from reward. There's consensus that the country is intolerably rigged in favor of those with power, but profound disagreement about who's winning and who's losing. The sense of frustration and injustice that generates support for a higher minimum wage comes from the same place as populist anger over "takers" who "live off the government."

In reality, of course, takers and workers are one and the same population. As with food stamps, the vast majority of the beneficiaries of ACA subsidies, including those eligible for nearly free coverage under the "private option" Medicaid expansion, do work. Many of them work two or three jobs at more than 50 hours per week and don't have a whisper of health coverage to show for it, relying on free clinics and the ER to address their inevitable medical needs. Many others work part time or are unemployed, because it's damn hard to find a decent job in this economy. But when conservatives visualize who's getting new access to basic health care, they don't see workers; they see takers.

To conservatives, this is about principle more than it is self-interest. Consider another question from the AFSCME survey last summer that asked voters whether raising the minimum wage would increase the cost of goods and services; almost 75 percent said yes (despite the fact that there's no evidence minimum wage hikes adversely affect economic growth). A majority of people think that a minimum wage hike might hurt them a bit, but a majority still thinks it's the right thing to do. Why? Because it seems fair.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Speaking of Affordable Care Act

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Most Shared

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

November

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Trust in Putin

    • If course, Putin himself is the ultimate political hack, just of the Russian variety. Truth,…

    • on November 17, 2017
  • Re: Another fox

    • In this case, "Follow the Money" means ALL roads lead deeper into the swamp.

    • on November 17, 2017
  • Re: The smell of the swamp

    • Sometimes I think we need an amendment where the minority party in the legislature chooses…

    • on November 17, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation