Favorite

President Clark? 

No month goes by that does not affirm some bit of the educated wisdom that warned President Bush not to invade Iraq in the first place. Within weeks of the invasion, the U.S. military proved what all the real experts, including the weapons inspectors from America’s Scott Ritter forward, told them, that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and not even Bush’s famous fallback, “weapons of mass destruction-related program activities.” Iraq had little capacity to threaten its neighbors, the Clinton administration having wiped out the air force and weakened the infantry and armed divisions so far that they could hardly have invaded Jordan. It was quickly apparent that, as the foreign-policy establishment warned, American alliances would be weakened, U.S. standing in the world undermined, the Middle East destabilized, Islamic extremism and terrorism fueled, the Muslim country torn apart by sectarian strife, and U.S. military forces stretched so thin that we could not influence far more dangerous situations like Iran and North Korea. Now comes virtual confirmation of the last dire prewar warning, that the occupation of Iraq would in the end reverse the one thing we sort of liked about Saddam Hussein’s brutal regime: It at least was secular. He hated Islamic radicals although his handling of them was hardly admirable. He tortured them and slew their families. President Bush promised to see to it that Iraq would have a democratic and secular government. The proposed new Iraqi constitution, praised by Bush, declares that the country will be an Islamic state and that no law can be passed that does not comply with Islamic rules, which shall be the source of all legislation. The Shia delegates satisfied the American advisers by including lip service to civil liberties far down in the document, including an Iraqi version of the Equal Rights Amendment, but Iraqi women know that it is useless pablum. Owing to all these predictable failings, President Bush’s poll numbers are about the lowest in history for this period in his presidency. Most Americans believe the war was a mistake and a third of them think the United States should pull out its troops. Where does that leave the Democrats in Congress, who by and large embraced war with Iraq as the first option and who, with rare but growing exceptions, still defend the war and the president’s stay-the-course strategy? Should not the same opprobrium be attached to those of either party who embraced and impelled the most destructive foreign-policy blunder in the last 80 years? Knowing what the consequences of the war were likely to be, they did it because they feared the chance that Bush might actually be successful and could pin them with being unpatriotic and soft on terrorism. Here is a proposal for Democrats: They should place a special burden on those who supported Bush and voted for the war resolution in 2002 before considering them for leadership, including the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. They must somehow dispel that lack of judgment or courage. Silence or timid criticisms of the president’s war-making tactics would not be enough. The list would include the hapless John Kerry and John Edwards, the 2004 Democratic team, and, yes, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who embraced Bush’s prewar lies almost as strongly as any Republican. Being brilliant and moderately progressive does not give her a pass on the overriding issue of her time in the Senate. And it would include Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, the single semi-declared presidential candidate in 2008. Biden expects the issue to be behind him by 2008. He said last week he expected Bush, contrary to the president’s vows, to pull the troops out of Iraq by the end of next year if Iraq has not been stabilized. That would leave two viable candidates among the current prospects, Sen. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin and our own Gen. Wesley Clark, the former supreme NATO commander who, after a rough start, has argued consistently against the war but for strategies that might actually help Bush succeed. Feingold, who almost alone in the U.S. Senate yokes his votes to his conscience, cast one of the 23 Senate votes against empowering Bush to attack Iraq and now proposes that the United States declare its intentions to withdraw American forces by the end of next year and leave the country in the hands of the elected government and its own security forces. He is so far all alone. Clark is more diplomatic. Alone among all the politicians of either party — and that includes the entire Bush administration — he has outlined a plan for pacifying the factions and stabilizing the country that actually could make Bush a prophet. But, writing on the op-ed page of the Washington Post last week, he sounded fatalistic. “President Bush and his team,” Clark wrote, “are repeating the failure of Vietnam: failing to craft a realistic and effective policy and instead simply demanding that the American people show resolve. Resolve isn’t enough to mend a flawed approach — or to save the lives of our troops. If the administration won’t adopt a winning strategy, then the American people will be justified in demanding that it bring our troops home.” In the end, both men will be prophets with honor in their party — and a good ticket.
Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • Darkly paid judges

    This is the third Arkansas election cycle in a row where corporate interests have used the cover of dark money and semisecret political action committees to try to install cozy appellate judges.
    • May 31, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • Darkly paid judges

    This is the third Arkansas election cycle in a row where corporate interests have used the cover of dark money and semisecret political action committees to try to install cozy appellate judges.
    • May 31, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation