Favorite

Punishing the poor 

It behooves nearly every generation of Arkansas political leaders to write another chapter in the enduring and simple annals of punishing the poor. Governor Hutchinson is writing the current one, with the help of his merry Republicans in the legislature.

By next year, they will have cut off medical insurance for 100,000 or more of the poorest and most desperate citizens because they won't or can't prove they are working or otherwise can't climb over the confounding bureaucratic hurdles erected by the state to hold on to their insurance.

If Attorney General Leslie Rutledge gets her way, with the help of other Republican attorneys general, President Trump and his Supreme Court appointees, another 250,000 will lose their coverage when the court voids the Affordable Care Act. Working people will lose their premium subsidies and those with preexisting conditions or whose age, sex or health profiles make them questionable risks for insurance companies will be out of luck.

Arkansas has always been better at punishing the indolent poor because we have more of them, proportionally, than almost every state and poorer public-health and education systems that produce more adults with mental, physical and emotional disorders.

Every society has had to deal with its vagabonds, and our European ancestors, like the current generation of politicians, often adopted a tough-love rationale: We're doing it to force them to make better life choices. As Governor Hutchinson says, they'll thank us later.

Toward the end of the Middle Ages, when the Black Plague depopulated the continent, England passed the poor laws to force the beggars and bums to refill the labor force. Parliament passed a law putting them in stocks for three days and three nights with only bread and water and then giving them the bum's rush out of town if they had not gotten a job. When that didn't work, Henry VIII ordered regular whippings to take the place of stocks. No studies of its effectiveness in building the workforce exist.

In Arkansas, the popularity of the poor has waxed and waned. A century ago, Gov. Charles Brough got the legislature to authorize free medical care for the poor who were sick or crippled, a small subsidy for poor women with dependent kids and a school for feebleminded kids. (OK, he also unleashed federal troops on black sharecroppers in Phillips County who were already being slaughtered by vigilantes.)

At the depth of the Great Depression in 1934, Gov. J. Marion Futrell slashed state spending and refused to put up a dime of state money to match federal dollars for relief of a starving population beggared by devastating floods, drought and the Depression. On the theory that people didn't need so much education to find honest toil, he cut school spending and tried to end high schools altogether. In March 1935, the Roosevelt administration ended all federal dollars to Arkansas because, alone of the states, it refused to pay even a piddling amount for food commodities and other relief or to pay schoolteachers. Futrell feared mobs attacking the Capitol and begged the legislature to pass a sales tax, end prohibition and tax liquor to pay for the stuff Roosevelt wanted. Even then, Futrell had the state give the relief money to the big landowners, who rarely shared it with sharecroppers and tenant farmers, especially blacks.

A Futrell disciple from down the road at Jonesboro, Gov. Francis Cherry, had some of the same instincts in 1953, after he had beaten the liberal Sid McMath. Cherry promised to rid the welfare rolls of "deadheads" and sent the legislature seven bills to give him that power. Cherry said he was doing it for the deadheads' benefit — they would get a job and be happier.

One bill required everyone enrolled in "welfare" programs for the elderly, disabled and dependent children to give the state a lien on their real property and give up any savings as a condition of continuing their benefits. That bill was too much even for the legislature, but Cherry did manage to lop 2,300 deadheads from the rolls before the 1954 election. Young Orval Faubus, who would beat him, accused Cherry of making a poor widow give up the $200 she had put aside for her funeral.

Cherry's penury would be piddling today, when the health care of 350,000 poor Arkansans is at risk. Hutchinson's work requirement and other administrative waivers he has sought to end coverage under the Affordable Care Act run counter to the law, which says waivers can be made only to increase coverage and to improve health deliveries. The governor says all his reforms are intended to provoke people into getting a job, increasing their happiness and prospects for getting health insurance on their own. So, why didn't it work before they got insurance?

The actual results of ending medical coverage for so many people, in addition to the private suffering, will be the loss of billions of dollars of federal stimulus to the economy and, for the state government, the loss of millions of dollars in premium, income and sales tax receipts. But who is counting?

There is no evidence that punitive "welfare reforms" have ever worked except to end welfare payments. Cherry was a man of immaculate probity but a stumbling politician. Hutchinson certainly and Rutledge maybe will show the old man's wraith how popular parsimony can be.

Favorite

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • Prelude to war

    President Trump's casual disinterest in the murder of Jamaal Khashoggi by Saudi Arabia's leaders, a crime he once abhorred, may be only the final repudiation of America's ancient obedience to human rights, but what if it is much more? What if it is a prelude to war?
    • Nov 29, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • Prelude to war

    President Trump's casual disinterest in the murder of Jamaal Khashoggi by Saudi Arabia's leaders, a crime he once abhorred, may be only the final repudiation of America's ancient obedience to human rights, but what if it is much more? What if it is a prelude to war?
    • Nov 29, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: No leash

    • "If you're lucky enough to acquire them as little kittens..." Huh. That might even convince…

    • on December 14, 2018
  • Re: No leash

    • Contrary to popular stereotypes, cats are very social and trainable. The key to training them…

    • on December 14, 2018
  • Re: No leash

    • Don't try to put Santa hats or elf shoes on them, either.

    • on December 14, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation