Reward the good guys 

In theory, the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion 30 years ago would not be an issue in an Arkansas governor’s race or attorney general’s race, since neither office has jurisdiction in the matter. In practice, abortion may be an issue in both races this year, as there are people passionate in their beliefs who will not tolerate a candidate that disagrees, even if the disagreement seems irrelevant to the office the candidate seeks. It’s an old rule of politics that the voters decide what issues are important.

Usually, the “pro-life” side has more supporters who actually vote than does the “pro-choice” faction, which includes many who believe that women should retain dominion over their own bodies, but don’t believe it strongly enough to go to the polls.

Arkansas’s “pro-choicers” had best not be lackadaisical this year. Asa Hutchinson and Gunner DeLay’s call for overturning Roe v. Wade will produce more votes than will their stance on issues less emotional but more pertinent. They’ll bring it up again and again. Mike Beebe and Dustin McDaniel have both said that Roe v. Wade should not be overturned. Even if there’s little they can do about it, good intentions count for something. They need to be rewarded by the “pro-choicers” just as surely as they will be punished by the “pro-lifers.”

Indifference, the excuse that one candidate is basically the same as another, helped put George Bush in office. Surely, no one still believes that Bush is no different from Al Gore or John Kerry. (We started to say “helped elect,” then remembered that Bush wasn’t elected but court-appointed. He is an ardent pro-lifer, by the way, and appoints no judges who aren’t.)

As the playwright Tony Kushner says, we are always agents. When we don’t act, we act. When we don’t vote, we vote.

That champion of the overdog, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page, has lately been trying to present itself as sympathetic to the little guy, demanding repeal of the state sales tax on food. But it is the little guy who derives benefit — in the form of public schools and other services — from the income the tax on food provides. To advocate repeal without suggesting a way to replace the lost revenue is cynical in the extreme. The D-G would do well to read its letters-to-the editor page, where Dr. Charles Venus, an authority on the Arkansas tax structure, points out that poor people would be much better served by an earned income tax credit than by repeal of the sales tax on food. Public-interest groups have in the past asked that Arkansas adopt an EITC. We don’t recall the Democrat-Gazette coming to their aid.


From the ArkTimes store


Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Bipartisan deal to continue subsidies Trump ended. But ...

    Everyone's reporting that Sens. Patty Murray and Lamar Alexander have struck a bipartisan deal on to continue federal subsidies for health coverage that Donald Trump cut off.
    • Oct 17, 2017
  • Tuesday: Open line, news roundup

    The open line, plus the day's news roundup.
    • Oct 17, 2017
  • James Lee Witt corrects Trump on grade for Puerto Rico relief effort

    Donald Trump twice yesterday used James Lee Witt, Bill Clinton's widely hailed FEMA director and now in the private business of assisting in disasters, as a reference on the work he's done responding to hurricanes this year. Media, particularly on the conservative end, have echoed the Trump remarks.But hold on: Witt wasn't talking about Puerto Rico.
    • Oct 17, 2017
  • More »

More by Arkansas Times Staff

Most Shared

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Trust and obey

    • A very timely and beautifully written piece. Indeed, the whole frightening paradigm is about preserving…

    • on October 15, 2017

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation