Favorite

Sexism everywhere 

This past week I was a member of a panel of attorneys addressing discrimination in the practice of law. Just like any field, sexism exists in the legal industry, especially in certain practice areas. It's something I've been used to and aware of since I was a law student 15 years ago when a professor advised us that some local attorneys serving as judges at our school moot court competition might hold it against female students if we wore pants instead of a skirt. That story didn't make it in to my remarks to the students last week, but the warning hung around with me for a decade. It wasn't until around three years ago that I wore pants for the first time in front of a jury. Previously, I had only worn skirt suits and always with nude pantyhose underneath in the fear that an older, conservative juror might hold it against my client because his or her attorney dared bare her legs in the courthouse.

Because I've been deep in the legal world for the past 15 years, I never had much exposure to sexism in journalism until I started writing this column. But in recent weeks it has been hard to ignore the debate going on in Central Arkansas the "Babe Bracket," a yearly tournament-style contest put on by KABZ-FM, 103.7 "The Buzz" that pits female television journalists against each other. As you can probably deduce from the name, the contest seems to be primarily based on looks. Austin Kellerman, news director at KARK, seemed to start the debate by writing a story calling for the end of the contest. Kellerman was swiftly attacked online for his views and accused of trying to use the contest for ratings. Odd criticism since the contest actually uses the female journalists for the radio station ratings.

The debate over the bracket continued to swirl around Twitter and went nuclear when Governor Hutchinson appeared on the radio station during a charity event and yukked it up by celebrating the "good spirit" of the contest. Big mistake. Either the governor didn't think it through or he just was unprepared, but I can't imagine any public figure not anticipating being asked about the bracket, especially since the men behind the contest seem so proud it. My first words upon hearing his comments cannot be printed here, but if you follow me on Twitter, you'll see that I had to immediately issue an apology to my mother for using such language. I always thought Hutchinson had more sense than to support such a blatantly sexist contest. While he later tried to walk back his comments, his initial attitude toward the Babe Bracket was inexcusable.

I was proud to see a few weeks later that several of the journalists started using the hashtag #morethanababe to push back against the idea that they were just pretty talking heads. Many of the contestants have won Associated Press Awards, Edward R. Murrow Awards and Emmys. The hashtag spread and women from all professions joined together to speak up against sexism and the idea that looks are paramount.

It's fair, as some supporters of the contest pointed out, to criticize the local TV stations for creating a culture that places such a high value on appearances. More diversity in age and size would be welcome, but this is not the fault of the female journalists. After tweeting my support of those who want to end the contest, I learned firsthand that criticizing the Babe Bracket was tough. Women who spoke up were accused of being jealous of the female journalists chosen for the contest, accused of being fat, and accused of being hypocritical if we had ever dared be in a beauty pageant (which is completely different because the women did not choose to be in the radio contest). Well, I was in a beauty pageant many years ago, and today, after two kids, I'm weighing in at my highest, and I'll freely admit that I am jealous of these women. I'm jealous that they make what is a tough job look so easy. Most of them are involved in their communities, are up early or out late bringing us the news, and doing it all while also having to worry about their hair and makeup. They deserve to be celebrated for their accomplishments, not merely reduced to being "babes."

Even after the pushback, the disc jockeys at the station have decided to continue with the contest under a different name. It remains to be seen if it is a true change or a change in name alone. But I'm glad the women spoke up. I'm glad to see sexism and the objectification of women being called out. Let's hope the next time something like this happens, we won't have to hear our governor giving that kind of "boys will be boys" behavior a pass.

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Autumn Tolbert

  • Power: not for the people

    Monday night, I joined around 40 people in a small room on the third floor of the Fayetteville City Hall for an emergency meeting of the Fayetteville Housing Authority.
    • Jul 12, 2018
  • Privileged civility

    By now, we have all seen take after take from journalists and politicians about the events last Friday night at the Red Hen in Lexington, Va., where White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave the restaurant after the owner and the staff decided they did not want to serve her.
    • Jun 28, 2018
  • Hardened

    The annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention this week has me thinking about two things that just can't quit each other: politics and religion. Peas and carrots to some. Oil and water to others. Either way, to write on politics in the South is to write on religion in the South.
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Wrasslin' Trump

    I first thought the Sunday morning video clip of President Trump wrestling was something from one of the many parody accounts on Twitter.
    • Jul 6, 2017
  • Another Jesus

    If you follow the logic of Jason Rapert and his supporters, God is very pleased so many have donated money to rebuild a giant stone slab with some rules on it. A few minutes on Rapert's Facebook page (if he hasn't blocked you yet) also shows his supporters believe that Jesus wants us to lock up more people in prison, close our borders to those in need and let poor Americans fend for themselves for food and health care.
    • Jul 20, 2017
  • A fresh start

    For much of my adult life, I've tried to eat black-eyed peas and greens every New Year's Day, worrying that if I didn't, the year would be just awful. I've made resolutions. I've sworn off fast food. I've pledged to go to the gym three times a week.
    • Jan 4, 2018

Latest in Autumn Tolbert

  • Power: not for the people

    Monday night, I joined around 40 people in a small room on the third floor of the Fayetteville City Hall for an emergency meeting of the Fayetteville Housing Authority.
    • Jul 12, 2018
  • Privileged civility

    By now, we have all seen take after take from journalists and politicians about the events last Friday night at the Red Hen in Lexington, Va., where White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave the restaurant after the owner and the staff decided they did not want to serve her.
    • Jun 28, 2018
  • Hardened

    The annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention this week has me thinking about two things that just can't quit each other: politics and religion. Peas and carrots to some. Oil and water to others. Either way, to write on politics in the South is to write on religion in the South.
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • No sense of decency

    July 16 had all the attributes of the day when Donald Trump approached that "tide in the affairs of men" where they take the fateful step that leads on to either good fortune in life or misery. Good fortune, you sense, is not going to be the outcome this time.

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation