Soviets and the Fed 

State Sen. Jim Holt of Springdale, the state Republican Party’s horrible mistake of a nominee for lieutenant governor, proclaimed the other day that early childhood development programs run by the government represent Soviet-styled socialism.

He needs to take that up with the lily-livered leftists who work as economists for the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. That’s part of what we call the Fed, which is only America’s central bank in charge of a little thing known as our monetary policy. Joe McCarthy warned us about this.

Since 2003, the Fed’s regional branch in Minnesota’s largest city has been conducting and touting studies purporting to show that pre-kindergarten programs for kids ages 3 and 4 represent the smartest investment government can make. One study specifically asserted that pre-K was a much sounder investment of public funds than subsidies for ballparks, which are rampant from New York to, maybe soon, Springdale.

Here’s a quote from a three-year-old report of Minneapolis’ Fed branch: “The quality of life for a child and the contributions the child makes to society as an adult can be traced back to the first few years of life. From birth until about 5 years old a child undergoes tremendous growth and change. If this period of life includes support for growth in cognition, language, motor skills, adaptive skills and social-emotional functioning, this child is more likely to succeed in school and later contribute to society. However, without support during these early years, a child is more likely to drop out of school, receive welfare benefits and commit crime.”

Art Rolnick, the Minneapolis bank’s senior vice president for research, told a conference of 200 businessmen that his analysis found a 16 percent real rate of return on our initial investment in early childhood development. He compared that to long-term stock market investments that usually render gains in the 7 percent range. He said that 4 percent of that rate of return on pre-K directly benefits the child in the form of a better job. The other 12 percent is realized by all of us, he said, in the form of reduced crime and a lessened need for special services for the poor and disadvantaged.

To Jim Holt, who wants us to put him a heartbeat from the Governor’s Mansion, nothing less than America’s central bank touts socialism over the consummate icon of American capitalism we call the stock market.

You might not know that the Arkansas Legislature is approximately as socialistic as the Fed. Our lawmakers have committed to a $100 million investment in early childhood programs and funded $60 million so far. It’s not mandatory, though. Our state Supreme Court has said that while we may and should offer pre-K programs and target them to impoverished areas where poor and uneducated children bearing children out of wedlock remains an epidemic, we can’t mandate attendance.

That’s logical. After all, we don’t even mandate attendance to public schools. Jim Holt knows that, since he doesn’t send any of his youngsters -- eight at last count -- to school. He surely doesn’t want them to fall under the evil influences of those socialistic invaders masquerading as public schools and the Federal Reserve.

A postscript: Holt also says that a minimum wage represents Soviet-styled socialism. Research shows that those dirty reds in New Zealand were first to impose such a dastardly thing, in 1918, which, Holt might remind us, came one year after the Bolshevik Revolution. The professed idea was to provide that a man working for a living could be assured of the ability to support his family of four in “frugal comfort.” Soon this red menace spread by dreaded domino effect to other Soviet bloc countries such as Australia, Great Britain and, by the late 1930s, the good ol’ U.S. of A.

Thank goodness we in America don’t take it too seriously anymore. We’ve kept our minimum wage the same while raising congressional pay by more than $30,000 a year.


From the ArkTimes store


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Most Shared

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Most Viewed

  • Gratitude

    Now, more than ever, I find myself thankful for those who resist. Those who remind us of our higher common values. The fact-checkers and truth-tellers. Those who build bridges in communities instead of walls to segregate. The ones who stand up and speak out against injustice.
  • A difference

    How low can a columnist go? On evidence, nowhere near as low as the president of the United States. I'd intended to highlight certain ironies in the career of U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). The self-anointed moral arbiter of the Senate began her career as a tobacco company lawyer — that is, somebody ill-suited to demand absolute purity of anybody, much less Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).
  • Money talks

    Democratic candidates face a dilemma in Arkansas. To take on the GOP members who are firmly entrenched in the state Legislature and Congress, they will need lots of money and lots of votes. The easiest way to get more votes is to spend more money. Obscene amounts of money. And thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision and President Trump's judicial appointments, this will be our reality for a long time. The six Republicans who make up our congressional delegation have stopped pretending to care about their constituents. They vote in line with the interests of big corporations and lobbyists. They know what side their bread is buttered on.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: A difference

    • History is likely to move with light speed in concluding that in late 2017 society…

    • on December 14, 2017
  • Re: A difference

    • Gillibrand is a tough chick, and she knows she is a political whore, like 95%…

    • on December 14, 2017
  • Re: Cats and dogs

    • I miss my wolves. It has been over five years since the last of my…

    • on December 12, 2017

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation