Favorite

Sticking it to the middle class 

Mike Huckabee is right about his party. Republicans should not be the party of fatcats by settling big tax cuts on the rich while the poor wait for someone else's wealth to splash onto them, as Huckabee described the philosophy in one of his books.

But the party's congressional wing betrays him at every turn. Last Friday, House Republicans voted en masse to protect an unsupportable tax break for the wealthy and to block tax relief for middle-income families. Not one Republican voted for a bill to prevent the dreaded alternative minimum tax (AMT) from hitting some 20 million middle-class households when they file their 2007 returns because the bill would compensate for the relief by closing a tax loophole for buyout-fund managers and some other investors.

Not even our own John Boozman, the 3rd District congressman, voted for it, although the beneficiaries of the tax cuts in his district probably outnumbered the losers by a ratio of 200 to 1. Party leaders wanted to hold rank for President Bush, who opposes the bill and promises to veto it if it reaches his desk. It won't, of course, because Senate Republicans and a couple of Democrats who are beholden to hedge-fund managers will keep the bill from a vote in the Senate. Congress will plunge even lower in the public's estimation by failing once again to take care of the public's urgent business.

Congress must act soon to prevent the AMT from hitting middle-income taxpayers, including some large families with incomes as low as $50,000. The AMT was instituted in 1969 to prevent wealthy taxpayers from using multiple tax breaks to escape federal taxes altogether after a routine treasury report to Congress mentioned that 155 millionaires paid not a penny in taxes that year.

But tax changes over the years, especially the Bush tax cuts for the rich between 2001 and 2004, perversely pulled millions of taxpayers in the middle-income range into the AMT. To prevent it, Congress each year adopts a temporary fix and postpones the permanent remedy because it would drastically reduce anticipated revenues. President Bush counts on projections of huge revenues from the AMT in the future to keep his deficit forecasts low.

The 2007 bill is a one-year fix, too, but it achieves revenue neutrality, which Democratic House rules require of tax and spending bills. In addition to taking middle-income families off the AMT roll for the year, which would reduce revenues by $51 billion, it would provide another $30 billion in new or extended middle-class relief: a property tax deduction, a tax exemption for military combat pay and deductions for college tuition, teachers' out-of-pocket expenses and employers of Katrina victims, among others.

The bill offsets those costs by closing the most outrageous loophole in the tax code, which allows executives of hedge funds and private-equity funds to pay income taxes at the very lowest rate of 15 percent on “carried interest” when their incomes should place them at the highest marginal rate. It is a giant subsidy to some of America's richest men by the working people of America, whose toil often puts them in a higher bracket.

So which side of the equation could you not support, extending relief from extraordinary rates for middle-income families and people facing peril or job pressures or ending the most conspicuous injustices in the tax code that favors the super-rich?

The Republican leader of the House urged his party to stand behind Bush and refuse to vote for a tax increase on the middle class. His “middle class” was a few thousand managers of private-equity and hedge-fund managers.

Boozman and other Republicans and Democrats who vote against the bill count on Americans buying the argument that buyout-fund managers are hard-pressed middle-class Americans or that the loss of the tax break will curtail job-creating investment.

Why not? It has worked in the past. That middle class is a sample of the same middle class that they said benefited from the big tax cuts of 2001-03 that pushed people into the AMT. The middle class was said to be the beneficiary of the dramatically slashed tax rates on capital gains and stock dividends in 2003, which put investment profits in the same bracket as the poorest wage-earners. The latest IRS data shows that actually the lowest half of American tax filers got virtually no savings from those tax cuts (only four-tenths of one percent of the total) and that 74 percent went to the richest Americans who made up only one-half of one percent of taxpayers.

Something tells me that people are not so easily gulled anymore.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Not Whitewater

    Just think: If Democrats had turned out 78,000 more votes in three states in November, people could be reveling today in the prospect of impeaching and convicting President Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, as some Republican lawmakers had promised to try to do if she won.
    • Jul 27, 2017
  • Trusting

    It is a Fourth of July ritual to appraise where we are in meeting the Declaration of Independence's promise to institute a government that would, unlike King George, secure human rights equally for everyone who sets foot on American soil.
    • Jul 6, 2017
  • Obamascare

    Republicans at long last may be about to see their most fervent wishes and wildest predictions materialize — millions of people losing their medical and hospital coverage, unaffordable insurance, lost jobs, a Medicare financial crisis, mushrooming federal budget deficits and fiscal crises across state governments.
    • Jun 22, 2017
  • More »

More by Fritz Brantley

  • He talks, and talks, the talk

    A fellow posted an old newspaper article on his blog about a Mike Huckabee speech to a religious group in 1998. A friend faxed the article to me, then called to ask if I’d yet read it, which I had.
    • Dec 20, 2007
  • The incredible shrinking Huckabee

    Plus: COPS!
    • Dec 20, 2007
  • Going whole hog

    A Q&A with irreverent Arkansas-raised comedian Matt Besser
    • Dec 20, 2007
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • AEC dumps ALEC

    No matter which side of the battle over global warming you're on, that was blockbuster news last week. No, not the signing of the climate-change treaty that commits all of Earth's 195 nations to lowering their greenhouse-gas emissions and slowing the heating of the planet, but American Electric Power's announcement that it would no longer underwrite efforts to block renewable energy or federal smokestack controls in the United States.
    • Dec 17, 2015
  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Dollars and degrees

    Governor Hutchinson says a high graduation rate (ours is about the lowest) and a larger quotient of college graduates in the population are critical to economic development. Every few months there is another, but old, key to unlocking growth.
    • Aug 25, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Not Whitewater

    Just think: If Democrats had turned out 78,000 more votes in three states in November, people could be reveling today in the prospect of impeaching and convicting President Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, as some Republican lawmakers had promised to try to do if she won.
    • Jul 27, 2017
  • The ACA can be fixed

    Majority Leader Mitch McConnell threatened his 51 disciples in the Senate and his party with the gravest injury imaginable.
    • Jul 13, 2017
  • Trusting

    It is a Fourth of July ritual to appraise where we are in meeting the Declaration of Independence's promise to institute a government that would, unlike King George, secure human rights equally for everyone who sets foot on American soil.
    • Jul 6, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

July

S M T W T F S
  1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Narrow opening for Arkansas Democrats

    "Somebody in this room — it's time to go big or go home." At the Democratic Party of Arkansas's Clinton Dinner last weekend, Gov. John Bel Edwards of Louisiana used his platform as keynote speaker to embolden a candidate to step up to run for governor against incumbent Republican Governor Hutchinson.
  • Head-shaking

    Another edition of so-much-bad-news-so-little space.
  • Buyer remorse

    Out here in flyover country, you can't hardly go by the feed store without running into a reporter doing one of those Wisdom of the Heartland stories.
  • Not Whitewater

    Just think: If Democrats had turned out 78,000 more votes in three states in November, people could be reveling today in the prospect of impeaching and convicting President Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, as some Republican lawmakers had promised to try to do if she won.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Another Jesus

    • I always enjoy reading your articles Autumn. You keep being the caring person you are…

    • on July 26, 2017
  • Re: Another Jesus

    • Sorry, I have never written about Hillary Clinton's "blunders" in Benghazi. Since you call them…

    • on July 25, 2017
  • Re: Another Jesus

    • IBS, were you there in Benghazi to personally witness all of Hillary's blunders like you…

    • on July 23, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation