Favorite

Tables turned 

Brett Kavanaugh's dilemma over a prep-school tussle with a girl provokes many proverbs, but one that seems most apropos is "what goes around comes around."

Kavanaugh finds himself this week in the boots that 20 years ago he personally shoehorned onto President Bill Clinton — facing questions under oath about a sexual escapade, an attempted rape in Kavanaugh's case, that he must not admit to his family, friends or the American people. The capstone of his life and his dream, a seat on the Supreme Court, would be forever out of reach.

You may remember the Clinton incident in 1998, although not Kavanaugh's role, which came to light in the release of internal documents from the Whitewater independent counsels' eight-year investigation of the Clintons' speculative 1977 land deal in Marion County. Desperate to advance his party's goal of impeaching and removing the hated Democrat, Kavanaugh insisted to his boss Kenneth Starr that Clinton be put under oath and made to deny each tawdry dalliance with Monica Lewinsky of which, unknown to Clinton, they had secret evidence. Kavanaugh knew that Clinton would have to lie because his marriage and romance with the American people would be over. Clinton had already told the country in a televised news conference that he had not had sex with "that woman, Miss Lewinsky." A sexual dalliance in the White House was disgusting though not illegal, but with Republicans in lockstep control of the House of Representatives they might nail him on obstruction of justice and perjury if Kavanaugh and Starr could force him to lie under oath.

Monday, unless something happens, Kavanaugh will face his accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, and both will be under oath. If he admits to some drunken frolicking with her, consensual or not, when they were teenagers, his nomination will be dead. If her testimony is compelling and his not so much, his future is sealed.

Kavanaugh's denial is backed by the other participant in the alleged attack, his high-school drinking buddy Mark Judge. High school friends of Kavanaugh, including two old girlfriends, signed statements that among girls he was a sober, gallant and respectful lad.

The senators who will question Kavanaugh and Ford surely will subpoena Judge, the only person apparently who can affirm or deny that it happened. Judge, a right-wing journalist, published a memoir in 1997 titled "Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk" about life with his buddies at a rich boys' prep school in Georgetown. One character, obviously a nom de plume, is an often drunken classmate whom he calls "Bart O'Kavanaugh," who at one point vomits and passes out in a car after leaving a party. Dr. Ford described both Kavanaugh and Judge as deliriously drunk the night of the attack.

Some senator might ask either Kavanaugh or Judge, if he is subpoenaed, if Bart was Brett.

The venue must look pretty safe to Kavanaugh. The woman seems to have no corroborating witnesses and he has a loyal buddy. There will be no proof that it happened and his party will only need to keep a couple of wavering senators in line.

Still, the whole episode reinforces the single reason that Brett Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court: He is an incorrigible partisan, the kind of person the framers thought should not get a lifetime appointment to the court because he would not bring independent judgment but a partisan obligation to great public issues. Otherwise, he has all the current pedigrees for the high court: graduate of a tony prep school, both undergraduate and law degrees from Yale, and a member of the right-wing Federalist Society.

Kavanaugh was an assistant to Starr when he was President George H.W. Bush's solicitor general, and both lost their jobs with the election of Clinton. When Starr was named the Whitewater prosecutor after the first one exonerated the White House in the suicide of Vince Foster, Kavanaugh joined his team to continue the pursuit of Foster's White House killers. After three years and millions of dollars he had to acknowledge that the deeply depressed Foster had killed himself with his father's antique pistol and went back to private practice.

In a famous panel discussion on the future of the independent counsel law, he doubted that presidents should be pursued for criminal acts while they were in office, a notion that he has since repeated and that made him Donald Trump's first choice for justice. Almost as soon as he had uttered the idea, the Monica Lewinsky story broke and Kavanaugh raced back to Starr's team to lead the pursuit of Clinton. It meant forcing the president to do something illegal, like tell a lie under oath, and he did.

Of course, as his supporters point out, he changed his mind just as Starr was about to present his recommendations in a confidential report to Congress. He worried that making all the lurid sex details available to Republican senators, who would leak them, would cause a political backlash against Starr and his team, which it did.

Politics, not the law, is his lodestar. So it will always be with Brett Kavanaugh.

Favorite

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • Prelude to war

    President Trump's casual disinterest in the murder of Jamaal Khashoggi by Saudi Arabia's leaders, a crime he once abhorred, may be only the final repudiation of America's ancient obedience to human rights, but what if it is much more? What if it is a prelude to war?
    • Nov 29, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • Prelude to war

    President Trump's casual disinterest in the murder of Jamaal Khashoggi by Saudi Arabia's leaders, a crime he once abhorred, may be only the final repudiation of America's ancient obedience to human rights, but what if it is much more? What if it is a prelude to war?
    • Nov 29, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: No leash

    • Why would anybody trim a cat's claws? That would interfere with their ability to defend…

    • on December 15, 2018
  • Re: No leash

    • "If you're lucky enough to acquire them as little kittens..." Huh. That might even convince…

    • on December 14, 2018
  • Re: No leash

    • Contrary to popular stereotypes, cats are very social and trainable. The key to training them…

    • on December 14, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation