Favorite

Tax gas, not groceries 

We are going to pay for long-overdue highway maintenance in Arkansas either by cutting off funding for essentials like schools and social workers, or by raising taxes. The most reasonable solution — a modest increase to the gasoline tax at a time of historically low fuel prices — hasn't gotten much serious consideration at the state Capitol, in large part because the governor and many legislators have ruled it out.

Yet, some of those same lawmakers who insisted on looking at only "revenue neutral" ideas for highway funding are suddenly considering an increase in the grocery tax as a possibility. Short of having a literal poor tax, a grocery tax increase is the least ethical method of paying for roads.

The grocery tax is hardest on low-income families because they spend a much larger share of their income on food that is prepared at home when compared to higher-income households. Working families who make less than $21,000 a year were left out of the 2015 personal income tax cuts in Arkansas that benefited every other income group. Their only hope for a tax break is a scheduled decrease in the grocery tax from 1.5 cents on the dollar to 1/8 cent on the dollar, potentially saving the average family roughly $125 a year.

Some legislators want to revoke the tax decrease, leave the grocery tax at 1.5 percent and send the resulting higher revenues to highways instead of finally giving a break to working families. Make no mistake: Preventing the sunset of the grocery tax is still a tax increase. That's because the grocery tax phase-out is already in the law. No revenue-neutral diehard can honestly claim that reinstating the full grocery tax in future years is anything but a tax increase. It is egregious to give millions of dollars in tax breaks to the wealthy in capital gains kickbacks, pass a costly income tax cut for middle- and upper-income Arkansans, and then turn around and ask the only families who were completely left out of the last round of tax cuts to chip in a disproportionate share of their incomes for highways.

Increasing the fuel tax is a much better deal for low-income families than taxing groceries: A lot of low-income workers in Arkansas don't have a car, but they all eat. If you are on a tight budget, a fuel tax isn't going to hurt as much as a tax on staple foods.

Nonetheless, higher gas taxes still burden poor households. That is why the fair and reasonable solution is to bump up fuel taxes and pair that with a tax credit for working families. A state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) would help balance out the cost of the tax increase for low-income working families without eclipsing the major revenue gains to the state.

Unless we plan on restoring the 1.5 percent grocery tax and piling a bigger burden on low-income working families year after year, there is no way for the grocery tax proposal to keep up with growing highway needs. The long-term, common-sense revenue solution is a modernized fuel tax.

A 2.5-cent fuel tax increase (indexed to keep pace with inflation and gains in vehicle fuel efficiency) would generate more revenue than the governor's recent highway plan at a cost of only $25 a year to middle-income Arkansans in the first year. Lower income people would pay even less on average. Without a smart fuel tax change, we will either pay for highways by picking the pockets of the most vulnerable families in our state, or by cutting funds from pre-K, child welfare programs and other services that assist those same families.

Eleanor Wheeler is a senior policy analyst for Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ellie Wheeler

  • No relief for renters

    If you are hoping to see new laws that improve rights for people who rent homes or apartments in Arkansas, you will find disappointing two bills proposed so far this legislative session — SB 25, by Sen. Blake Johnson (R-Corning), and HB 1166, by Rep. Laurie Rushing (R-Hot Springs). Even if both bills become statute, Arkansas would still have the worst landlord tenant laws in the country.
    • Feb 2, 2017
  • Let them eat cake

    An unproductive and harmful bill attempting to curb obesity passed easily out of committee last week at the state legislature. House Bill 1035 attempts to address this serious public health issue by preventing poor families who rely on SNAP (the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly called food stamps) from purchasing certain items such as candy and sodas.
    • Jan 26, 2017
  • Help all veterans

    Veteran-specific bills often miss the mark on helping the most sympathetic military families by focusing on retirement income.
    • Dec 22, 2016
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Schlafly's influence

    Phyllis Schlafly, mother, attorney and longtime antifeminist, died recently. What Schlafly promoted was not novel or new. Men had been saying that men and women were not equal for years. However, anti-feminism, anti-women language had much more power coming from a woman who professed to be looking out for the good of all women and families.
    • Sep 15, 2016
  • Seven

    The controversy over the Ten Commandments monument on the Capitol lawn just won't go away.
    • Feb 9, 2017
  • Why a change of leadership at the LRSD now?

    Johnny Key's abrupt, unilateral decision to not renew Baker Kurrus' contract as superintendent strikes us as shortsighted, misguided and detrimental to the education of our children and the health of our community.
    • Apr 21, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Guest Writer

  • Vote no on school tax

    I have never voted against a school tax in my life, but I will be voting against the debt service millage extension for the Little Rock School District.
    • May 4, 2017
  • Intracity tourism

    The issues that tug at my heartstrings are neighborhood stigma and neighborhood segregation, which are so prevalent in Little Rock. In my opinion, the solution to those problems is "intracity tourism."
    • Apr 27, 2017
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
    • Apr 20, 2017
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Paddling the Fourche Creek Urban Water Trail

Paddling the Fourche Creek Urban Water Trail

Underutilized waterway is a hidden gem in urban Little Rock

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Trump unfit

    • Sorry, sorry - I mis-spoke or mis-wrote - the ACTUAL headline on the article was…

    • on May 23, 2017
  • Re: Trump unfit

    • Sez who, Al? All Trump said is that he has the right as President, to…

    • on May 23, 2017
  • Re: Goodbye, Mr. Trump

    • Well, the irony is delicious, but the fact of the matter has been that the…

    • on May 23, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation