Favorite

The dirty tax secret 

If you're among the angry hordes who hate the federal income tax code, thanks to your hero George W. Bush you likely won't have to deal with it much longer. Trouble is, you're not going to like what replaces it. It's the alternative minimum tax, and it's the dirty little secret behind the great Bush tax cuts of 2001, 2002 and 2003 and the one he's trying to push through Congress before the election. Most Arkansas families with children - about all of them except the poorest and the very richest - will soon be paying a tax that originally was intended to catch America's richest tax avoiders. If you're rearing children and your family pays Arkansas taxes on a modestly good income, and especially if you have a litter as big as a Republican congressional candidate, you might have detected a small reduction in your federal taxes. Enjoy it because Bush is going to take it back from most of you with the alternative minimum tax. And the bigger and sicker your family the quicker and the more you'll pay. Chances are that you will be paying the AMT - you should call it a tax increase - because President Bush wanted to give mammoth tax cuts to the very rich. Most people, it seems, are philosophical about the fact that more than half of the cumulative Bush tax cuts have gone to the richest 1 percent of Americans even though they pay only about 25 percent of federal taxes and have benefited from the greatest surge in concentration of the nation's wealth since the 1890s. They may change their minds when the big tax bills begin to hit in the next five or six years. People were not nearly as understanding back in 1969, when this story begins. Two days before President Lyndon B. Johnson left office, his treasury secretary artlessly mentioned to a congressional committee that 155 rich Americans paid no income tax in 1966 although their incomes exceeded $200,000 (the equivalent of $1 million today). Congress was buried under an avalanche of mail from people who were already sore because they were paying a surtax to finance the Vietnam War. (George Bush just puts the war on the tab.) Congress and President Richard M. Nixon responded by enacting the alternative minimum tax, which was supposed to see to it that the very rich couldn't come up with enough exemptions, credits and deductions to avoid taxes altogether. But the AMT is not indexed for inflation, unlike the regular income tax, and it has reached steadily deeper into the middle class. Bush sped the process. Slashing the top marginal tax rate, cutting taxes on capital gains and dividends, eliminating taxes on rich estates and giving new tax favors to corporations all helped the rich so he had to add a number of benefits that reached down to middle-class families, like expanded child tax credits and marriage-penalty relief. They enabled him to claim that his tax cuts helped most people, not just the rich, but he didn't tell them they also carried the seed that start raising middle-class taxes. The benefits trigger the alternative tax. The president never mentioned the AMT, although his chief economic adviser, who spent two yeas drawing up the 2001 tax cut, acknowledged that he was aware all along that it would push the alternative tax on growing numbers of middle-class families, chiefly those with children, those with high medical expenses and those living in states with income taxes. Bush's 2003 tax cut included a little provision that diluted the AMT's effects on returns that many people filed this year so that there wouldn't be an angry contingent this election year. But forget your situation. Here's the scary part. The number of families who will be shifted off the regular tax system and onto the AMT will grow exponentially every year starting in 2005 and it will soon just be too big to fix. The Urban Institute's Tax Policy Center calculates that in six years 97 percent of families with two children with incomes between$75,000 and $100,000 will be paying the AMT rather than the much smaller tax they would owe under the tax code. Many with incomes as low as $30,000 will be paying it. But 130,000 very rich families will disappear off the rolls. In the end, about the only people who will keep the benefits promised by Bush in the great tax-cutting party will be the top of the political donor class, the super rich. If Bush succeeds in making his tax cuts permanent, the fiscal impact will worsen. Here is the dilemma that Bush or John Kerry and Congress - and all of us really - will face. If they repeal the AMT or lift it from middle-class taxpayers, the loss of revenue - an estimated $600 billion by 2010 - it will turn the budget deficits created by Bush from staggering to stupendous. The AMT masks the effects of the Bush deficits, which this year amount to only about $700 billion exclusive of the short-lived Social Security trust surplus. Patriotism requires us to hush about it until after the election. Trust Bush to fix it, just like he has Iraq.
Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Bad health care bill, again

    Wait! Postpone tax reform and everything else for a while longer because the Senate is going to try to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act one more time before September ends and while it can do it with the votes of only 50 senators.
    • Sep 21, 2017
  • Climate blind

    If there was ever a teaching moment for a nation or a culture on an issue of historic importance, wouldn't it be the late summer of 2017 for climate change?
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Tax sham

    This week begins another ritual that has become the most celebrated sham of modern times. We always look forward to it, because it will make our country richer and happier and change all our lives for the better. We call it tax reform.
    • Sep 7, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Dollars and degrees

    Governor Hutchinson says a high graduation rate (ours is about the lowest) and a larger quotient of college graduates in the population are critical to economic development. Every few months there is another, but old, key to unlocking growth.
    • Aug 25, 2016

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Bad health care bill, again

    Wait! Postpone tax reform and everything else for a while longer because the Senate is going to try to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act one more time before September ends and while it can do it with the votes of only 50 senators.
    • Sep 21, 2017
  • Climate blind

    If there was ever a teaching moment for a nation or a culture on an issue of historic importance, wouldn't it be the late summer of 2017 for climate change?
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Tax sham

    This week begins another ritual that has become the most celebrated sham of modern times. We always look forward to it, because it will make our country richer and happier and change all our lives for the better. We call it tax reform.
    • Sep 7, 2017
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

September

S M T W T F S
  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Sex on campus

    • Nobody is blaming the victim. There also isn't some sinister patriarchy going on, it is…

    • on September 25, 2017
  • Re: Sex on campus

    • I'm in my 50's. I don't think I know a single woman who HASN'T been…

    • on September 25, 2017
  • Re: Sex on campus

    • Here we see a "social scientist" who begins with an ad hominem argument, and then…

    • on September 24, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation