Thinking | Arkansas news, politics, opinion, restaurants, music, movies and art

Thinking 
Member since Jun 8, 2010


Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Brantley: We are Penn State

    The independent review of the Penn State sex abuse scandal demolished the university's reputation.
    • Jul 18, 2012
  • This week's Times: The LR Tech Park

    The appearance of an organized opposition in a Central Little Rock neighborhood to expropriation of the neighborhood by the Little Rock Technology Park Authority prompted news coverage yesterday (on Channel 4) and elsewhere.
    • Mar 13, 2012
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Lawyers challenge role of prison director in determining competency of Jack Greene

The Supreme Court decided that manufacturers of lethal injection drugs are not shielded from disclosure, and must be disclosed by the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. In the same decision, the justices ordered that the lot, batch, and control number information on product labels for the lethal injection drugs be redacted because the justices swallowed the ADC lie that lot, batch, and control number information will identify sellers and suppliers of lethal injection drugs.

Had the justices done some college level research, they would have learned that lot, batch, and control information are used in the food and drug industry and by government regulators for quality control purposes. Check out the Code of Federal Regulations titled "Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding of Drugs" at 21 C.F.R. Section 210.3(b).

The Freedom of Information Act doesn't shield manufacturers. The Supreme Court opinion admits it. But the Supreme Court refused to follow the law and order the package label information that manufacturers must provide (lot, batch, and control numbers for drug products) to be disclosed to Steven Shults.

This is how fascism works. It is up to the public to resist it. The Arkansas Supreme Court has chosen to side with the fascists.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 11/03/2017 at 5:51 AM

Re: “Griffen files federal civil rights lawsuit over Good Friday vigil punishment

Judges and jurors aren't disqualified because they hold personal convictions unless it is clear they are unable or unwilling to apply the law evenly despite those convictions. Has Griffen refused to follow the law in death penalty cases? If not, it is wrong to use his religious convictions about the death penalty as reason to disqualify him. That is religious prejudice and bigotry against him.

If the First Amendment doesn't protect people from this, only people whose religious and other personal convictions are popular could be judges and jurors.

This is an interesting case. Griffen may not be popular, but he's no lightweight when it comes to the law, and his legal team appears locked and loaded for a hard fight. I wouldn't bet against them.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 10/07/2017 at 4:30 AM

Re: “Griffen files federal civil rights lawsuit over Good Friday vigil punishment

Hey folks, the First Amendment covers judges. Read it sometime. Disagree with Griffen if you will. Vote against him even. But he has the freedom to stand up or lay down because we're a free society.

Why can't a judge pray? Why does the Supreme Court get to decide how he prays or if he can pray? If he follows the law, leave him alone.

9 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 10/06/2017 at 6:49 AM

Re: “Gary Weir — Arkansas's Bozo — dies at 75

Condolences to his widow and other loved ones. Gary brought smiles to many faces and joy to many hearts. Travel onward, brother! Travel onward!

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 10/06/2017 at 6:41 AM

Re: “Filling a gap in Democrat-Gazette coverage of Central High event

Thank you, DBI! Your commentary about the Democrat-Gazette's owner and the mindset that drives his newspaper and cronies reminded me about something Dr. Robert Terry observed almost forty years ago when he issued the following definition for racism.

"Racism exists when one race/color group intentionally or unintentionally refuses to share power, distributes resources inequitably, maintains unresponsive and inflexible institutional policies, procedures, and practices, and imposes ethnocentric culture on any other race/color group for its supposed benefit, and justifies its actions by blaming the other race/color group."

White racism carries benefits, illegitimate to be sure, but experienced nonetheless. One of those "benefits" is the power to derive and enjoy a sense of moral numbness about how racism oppresses persons who are marginalized, exploited, and otherwise disfavored due to racist practices, policies, procedures, while feigning belief in equality and justice. Dr. Terry termed it "the rightness of whiteness."

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 09/27/2017 at 3:41 AM

Re: “Arkansas Capitol draws crowd for Charlottesville-inspired unity rally

Gopher and Razorblade illustrate the false logic of equating white supremacists with the counter protest movement that formed to denounce and condemn white supremacy.

The woman murdered and the 19 other people wounded by the driver of the car that rammed into counter protestors are victims. The driver of that car is not.

The counter protestors had every right to assemble and mount a peaceful counter protest to white supremacy, white nationalism, white supremacists, and white nationalism. The white nationalists who terrorized and assaulted counter protestors on Friday with torches and pepper spray were law breakers. The counter protestors who refrained from violence acted lawfully.

Gopher and Razorblade seem incapable of understanding this reality.

19 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 08/14/2017 at 9:32 AM

Re: “Arkansas Capitol draws crowd for Charlottesville-inspired unity rally

Thank you, Poison Apple, for making the point that a Trump rally is a white supremacist rally.

Judge Wendell Griffen made a related point, on a larger scale, in his book, The Fierce Urgency of Prophetic Hope, about the intersection of white supremacy and white evangelicalism, in these words:

"White evangelicals, who are offended by being identified as white nationalists, pretend they do not knnow that the voting history of "good" white Christian evangelicals is functionally the same as white supremacists, such as David Duke and Thom Robb, people who also claim to be followers of Jesus. Despite their shared voting history, "good" white Christian evangelicals believe themselves politically different from people like Duke, Robb, and Stephen K. Bannon, the president's Chief Strategist - whom many people consider to be clear examples of bigotry.

"However, others understand that white Christian evangelicals and white Christian supremacists traditionally vote the same way. Those self-proclaimed white evangelical Christians overwhelmingly voted for the president in 2016, knowing they were supporting the exact candidate endorsed by the Ku Klux Klan and Duke...

..."Good" white evangelicals and white supremacists like Duke, Robb, and other white nationalists who claim to be followers of Jesus have supported the same race-baiting, patriciarchal, militaristic, imperialistic, homophobic, sexist, materialistic, and xenophobic candidates for two generations -- since President Lyndon Johnson pushed through the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. President Trump's personal and commercial racism, white male supremacy and patriarchy, racist and misogynist bigotry, xenophobia, and pathological penchant for violence, oppressiveness, and fear of others will shape US policy for one reason: because "good" white evangelical Christians and white supremacists--white Christian nationalists--embraced his candidacy and elected him. Therefore, white Christian nationalists--the Christian evangelicals and Christian supremacists--will be the US voters viewed as morally and ethically accountable for what happens during Trump's presidency, including the injustices, injuries, and other wrongs that may occur during his tenure."

19 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by Thinking on 08/14/2017 at 9:17 AM

All Comments »


 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation