Favorite

Too much information 

As part of a new marketing campaign, Acxiom Corporation last week began projecting a big blue “X” on the side of its downtown Little Rock headquarters. But the symbolism is backwards, because in its business, the data management company is not a target. You are.

Acxiom pioneered technology that organizes consumer data, and now it wants to highlight its ability to analyze that data to help its clients with marketing and other strategic priorities. “We make information intelligent” is the tagline that accompanies Acxiom’s new branding initiative.

The timing couldn’t be better, as almost every type of business is trying to more accurately target likely customers. According to a recent article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, retailers in Little Rock’s new Midtowne center utilized “psychographics” to determine where to locate their new stores. In an increasingly competitive environment, mere demographic information — which is more detailed than ever before — is not enough. Now, behavioral scientists can pinpoint shopping habits by zip code, separating the “brand loyalists” from the “impulse buyers.”

It’s hardly shocking to learn that birds of a feather flock together. We have our own cultural shorthand and stereotyped expectations based on where people live, and more often than not, the preconceptions hold true. Even without the help of consumer data, an organic bakery and a gun shop wouldn’t normally end up next to each other.

So you can’t fault businesses for using the most advanced technology available, or Acxiom for offering it to them.

But the same techniques are finding their way into the hands of political strategists, who are applying them to voter identification and outreach. While that sounds logical and inevitable, it has consequences that already are altering our democracy in fundamental ways.

For example, leaders in both major parties are perfecting the art of gerrymandering districts at the local, state and federal levels to create safe seats for themselves. Armed with ever more sophisticated and exact data about voting patterns, they draw lines that take unnatural twists and turns, sometimes dividing neighbors who live across the street from each other.

This kind of manipulation not only helps incumbents, who already enjoy more than enough advantages under the current system. It also contributes to a more divisive political atmosphere, because with like-minded voters grouped together, there is no incentive for their representatives to moderate or compromise with other lawmakers. The best way to impress the folks back home is to exhibit ideological purity, which explains much of the extremism we’re seeing in Washington these days.

Tough luck if you’re one of those unpredictable types who chooses to live among people who are a little different than you are. You have no chance to have your interests represented, especially as data analysis improves and further isolates you into a smaller minority.

You’ll also be ignored by candidates, if they decide in advance you’re no use to them. One political consultant described to me in detail the winning strategy he employed in an important Arkansas municipal race. Using the latest election and polling data available, he sent his client not only to certain neighborhoods, but to certain houses, knocking on some doors but skipping others on the same street. Likely allies received a handshake and a smile and were encouraged to vote. Everyone else was carefully avoided.

That may be efficient and effective, but our representative system is threatened when it can be engineered to engage some people and marginalize others. Your rights are not infringed when Pottery Barn favors your neighbor with a sale circular because he has a documented weakness for mahogany furniture. But you have a fair complaint when your elected officials can safely and willfully discount your concerns because your voting record shows you’re part of the minority. They are supposed to represent everyone, after all.

Since the problem will only get worse as more of our personal information is organized and analyzed, we should respond by at least adopting a non-partisan redistricting process. In Iowa, for instance, the panel that draws legislative boundaries is prohibited from considering previous election results or even the addresses of incumbents. Less information, not more, is the key to fairness in these matters. Only geographic common sense should govern where the lines go.

As it becomes easier to divide and separate us by what we think and believe, we should do whatever we can to ensure that citizens are treated equally, without regard to personal characteristics and behavior. In the end, all of us may be transparent collections of predictable preferences, but we’re entitled to a government that hardly knows us.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Warwick Sabin

  • Helena's disappearing buildings

    Preservationists hope to slow demolitions.
    • Mar 22, 2007
  • Trailers headed to Dumas

    Gov. Mike Beebe issued the following statement earlier today: Although this decision by FEMA to deny emergency funds to Desha County defies common sense, Arkansas will take care of its own people.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • Youth Ranch robbed, vandalized

    According to a press release we just received: The Donald W. Reynolds Campus of the Arkansas Sheriff’s Youth Ranches (The Ranch) located near Fort Smith was vandalized overnight Thursday.  Items stolen during the break-in included all of the children’s saddles, food, tools and supplies from The Ranch’s carpentry shop and all equipment from its auto shop.  An investigation is underway with the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • More »

Most Shared

Latest in Warwick Sabin

  • Trickle-up theory

    Through thick and thin, there has always been one group of dedicated Americans whose support for President George W. Bush has been unwavering: The wealthy.
    • Mar 8, 2007
  • Time to go

    Tough questions face us in Iraq and it's time to confront them directly.
    • Mar 1, 2007
  • Plugged in

    One reason why the South remained solidly Democratic during the mid-20th century was the enduring gratitude to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who brought electricity to the poor, rural parts of the region. According to one historical account, “Althou
    • Feb 22, 2007
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

December

S M T W T F S
  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31  

Most Viewed

  • A difference

    How low can a columnist go? On evidence, nowhere near as low as the president of the United States. I'd intended to highlight certain ironies in the career of U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). The self-anointed moral arbiter of the Senate began her career as a tobacco company lawyer — that is, somebody ill-suited to demand absolute purity of anybody, much less Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).
  • Money talks

    Democratic candidates face a dilemma in Arkansas. To take on the GOP members who are firmly entrenched in the state Legislature and Congress, they will need lots of money and lots of votes. The easiest way to get more votes is to spend more money. Obscene amounts of money. And thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision and President Trump's judicial appointments, this will be our reality for a long time. The six Republicans who make up our congressional delegation have stopped pretending to care about their constituents. They vote in line with the interests of big corporations and lobbyists. They know what side their bread is buttered on.
  • Gratitude

    Now, more than ever, I find myself thankful for those who resist. Those who remind us of our higher common values. The fact-checkers and truth-tellers. Those who build bridges in communities instead of walls to segregate. The ones who stand up and speak out against injustice.
  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Cats and dogs

    • I miss my wolves. It has been over five years since the last of my…

    • on December 12, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation