Favorite

Trumpcare 

Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.

But in the case of Obamacare and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, wisdom, or a tiny cache of it, is what has befallen the president suddenly, and it has created a dilemma for the party with which he shares governance.

Through the campaign and afterward, Trump described Obamacare (never "the Affordable Care Act") as a "total disaster" and he promised to replace it with a system that covered every American with better benefits and at costs far lower than people now pay for their insurance. His exact words: "We're going to have insurance for everybody. There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can't pay for it, you don't get it. That's not going to happen with us. People can expect to have great health care . . . much less expensive and much better."

If he had the barest knowledge of what the law did, he would have known his promise was mathematically impossible, unless he had in mind some form of universal socialized medicine like Great Britain's, Israel's or Cuba's, and also a political absurdity.

Someone sat him down in late February and explained to him how Obamacare worked and why dismayed congressional Republicans in seven years had never produced the miraculous replacement he had described.

"Nobody knew health care could be so complicated," Trump mused.

But House Republicans unveiled their plan Monday and hoped to rush it through committees by week's end. It doesn't come close to meeting the president's description, but he will pretend that it does and will bet that the voters will be as ignorant of "Obamacare Lite," as conservatives are calling the GOP plan, as they (and he) were of the original.

Insurance will be far more expensive for millions of people, millions more relatively poor people will lose insurance altogether because the premiums will be far out of reach, others will have their benefits and coverage reduced, not expanded as Trump promised. And it will be repeal in name only. Like Obamacare, the plan is built upon government subsidies, in the form of income tax credits, to help people buy private health insurance policies, but the tax credits will be useless for people with low family wages because premiums and deductibles will be out of reach. People from 50 to 65 (Trump votes?) will see their premiums and deductibles soar so that people in their 20s can see theirs go down.

But Obamacare Lite will achieve the two things the big opponents of the law have sought most since 2010: It will end Obamacare's taxes on rich folks like the Koch brothers and the benefiting medical businesses, which pay for the program, and sharply reduce government aid for poor people to gain access to medical care.

In Arkansas, perhaps the single biggest beneficiary of Obamacare because it insured 400,000 of the state's neediest people and bailed out the state treasury and budget, the state government is moving in tandem with Washington's economic royalists by setting rules that deprive the poorest of health care if they can't hold a steady job. The governor rejoiced last week that 25,000 poor people had been stricken from the rolls and that many more would follow.

Congressional Republicans are experiencing a reprise of 2010, when people aroused by industry and party ads claiming this new law, "Obamacare," was going to strip away their Medicare, take medical decisions away from them and their doctors and assign it to the government, cut life support for grandma when she got sick, and turn America into a socialist state. The new president was unpopular enough in the South and rural Middle America and they assigned his name to this complicated system for expanding the right of medical care to everyone. Obama said he was happy to be its namesake, and that's what it became.

It had two big flaws, both pointed out by the insurance industry: The government's fundable tax credits were still too small to make private insurance affordable to many lower-income households and the tax penalty for people who didn't buy it was too low to induce healthy young people to buy it, which forced the companies to raise premiums. Red-state governors and legislatures threw up roadblocks, refusing in 19 states to cover the poorest people under Medicaid after the Supreme Court gave them the option and erecting other barriers to people buying the insurance. The Arkansas legislature blocked the use of $10 million of federal aid to help people enroll.

Slowly, ignorance subsided and now most Americans think Obamacare is a good deal and, like Social Security and Medicare, just needs some fixing.

They're already venting their doubts about Trumpcare, or Ryancare, or whatever distasteful epithet sticks to the ramshackle new health law, if indeed it passes. Republicans pray they remain at least partially ignorant until, say, after the 2018 election.

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Inhuman America

    Our history has included some evil passages — slavery and white supremacy, the forced removal of Native Americans from their homes, the imprisonment and dispossession of Japanese Americans during World War II, the torture of prisoners in latter-day wars — but it is also a part of our history that we came to officially regard them all with shame, as offenses to the human rights that were our original values.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Inhuman America

    Our history has included some evil passages — slavery and white supremacy, the forced removal of Native Americans from their homes, the imprisonment and dispossession of Japanese Americans during World War II, the torture of prisoners in latter-day wars — but it is also a part of our history that we came to officially regard them all with shame, as offenses to the human rights that were our original values.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Legislative boodlers

    Which sounds like the best use of your taxpayer dollars: helping pay for medical care for unemployed people, or bribing and lobbying legislators and other government officials to bestow millions of your tax dollars on a corrupt organization that claims it helps poor people who have drug problems or disabilities?
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • Scary Granny Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi has replaced Barack Obama as the all-purpose bete noir of Republican politicians, including Arkansas's, but will she be as potent as the black president?
    • Jun 7, 2018
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • The battle over Issue 1

    The odds are that the most spending in a statewide campaign in Arkansas this year will not be for a constitutional office, but instead in a battle over a proposed state constitutional amendment.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Him, again

    • That's why it is better to bag babes at the bigger libraries. You get a…

    • on June 20, 2018
  • Re: Legislative boodlers

    • The U6 unemployment rate is still at 8%, partly because they can get benefits and…

    • on June 19, 2018
  • Re: Him, again

    • Regardless of my success or lack of it, I've been way ahead of Trump all…

    • on June 19, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation