Favorite

Unfrivolous lawsuit 

Unfrivolous lawsuit

Even in a democratic society, some rights are too important to be left to popular vote. The founders of the United States of America knew that, and wrote these rights into the Constitution, forever protecting them from temporary majorities.

Opponents of Act 1 of 2008 have properly turned to the courts to assure that all citizens are given the equal treatment before the law that the Constitution promises. Act 1, prohibiting unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children, was approved by voters at the general election in November. It is aimed primarily at gay couples. Supporters of Act 1 would rather deny a good home to Arkansas children who need one than to grant equality to people whose sexual preference they disapprove of.

But this is not a decision they're entitled, or qualified, to make. There's no valid scientific evidence that gay couples — or unmarried heterosexuals either — cannot be good parents. Examples abound demonstrating the opposite. Adults and children from such homes are among the plaintiffs in the suit that has been filed in Pulaski Circuit Court.

Decisions on who is suitable to adopt or foster children, and who isn't, should be made by trained, unbiased social workers evaluating each case independently, free of the prejudice that Act 1 would impose.

 

What they're about

Men who propose to limit women's rights are low creatures to begin with, and even lower when they claim to be acting out of regard for women. The same is true of white people who discriminate against black people and say they're doing it for the good of the black people. And, in the instant case, of corporate bosses who harass workers in the name of worker protection. An honest oppressor owns up to his intentions — “I hurt you to help me. Get used to it.”

Such candor is lacking in the campaign against a bill that would shield employees from hostile employers while trying to form a union. (Money, on the other hand, is something the anti-union campaign has plenty of. Big business sees to that.)

Federal law now requires an election on the question of whether workers will join a union. The labor-backed bill before Congress would allow workers to go union by signing a card, making their choice before management has a chance to intimidate them.

Anti-union ads, like a recent one aimed at Sen. Blanche Lincoln, blather about the “secret ballot,” hardly the sponsors' chief concern. They're more desirous of low wages than secret ballots.  Up to now, they've had their way in Arkansas; ours remains an anti-union, low-income state. Lincoln and Sen. Mark Pryor could vote for change.     

 

Favorite

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

More by Arkansas Times Staff

  • End of the week headlines and your open line

    Alderman candidate misses chance to cast deciding vote for himself in runoff election; Dem-Gaz to phase out print delivery in El Dorado, Camden and Magnolia; Rapert threatens UA Fort Smith over 'Drag Queen Story Time' event; The Van seeks to raise $35,000 in three weeks for new warehouse facility in South Little Rock.
    • Dec 7, 2018
  • New episode of Out in Arkansas: "Boy Erased"

    Out in Arkansas’s hosts Traci Berry and Angie Bowen talk about all the things because all the things are LGBTQ things. This week T & A talk about “Boy Erased” and their own emotions during and after the movie. Thank you for listening! #outinarkansas #beinggayinthesouth #dontbeadouche #beadecentperson
    • Dec 7, 2018
  • Your Arkansas headlines and open line

    Man accused in 2005 beauty queen murder arrested for alleged attempt to kidnap women; Former state Rep. Jim House dies at 70; Rep. Johnny Rye filed a bill this morning that would allow civil legal action against social media companies that "delete or censor" content posted by users.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Herd shifts

    Some years ago, I watched a herd of nine mares stampede across a pasture on a friend's farm. It was an impressive spectacle, like that seen from the rail at a racetrack.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Herd shifts

    • Dearest Mytwo: I am not a Republican - they are responsible for all the guns…

    • on December 10, 2018
  • Re: Herd shifts

    • Oh my, my comment went bye - Al - from your quote, "Asking for direct…

    • on December 10, 2018
  • Re: Herd shifts

    • By now, smart Republicans have got to be catching each other's eyes. After enough quit…

    • on December 10, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation