Favorite

Wal-Mart's only a symptom 

Ralph Nader proclaimed last week that Wal-Mart is a "cancer on the economy." He was horribly wrong. The American economy has thrived during Wal-Mart's 30-year rise to total retail dominance. The company employs hundreds of thousands of people who might not work otherwise. It enriches countless others who hold stock. It graces millions of consumers with time-saving convenience and money-saving prices. And it provides a powerful gravitational field for vendors, other big-box retailers and assorted ancillary enterprises. Now, if Nader had called Wal-Mart a cancer on the culture, he would have been closer to truth. But to be precise, he'd have needed to call Wal-Mart only one of the more powerful manifestations of a spreading cancer. You cannot say that the automobile started this American disease. You can say, though, that the motor car began the weakening of the immune system. Then came the real cancer - racial separation. In the 1950s and '60s, white people of means got into those cars and drove them on Dwight D. Eisenhower's new super highways, meaning the bloodstream through which the cancer spread. These white people fled integrated public schools, once-vibrant downtown business districts and once-idyllic central city neighborhoods. They pursued suburban seclusion. Shopping centers naturally followed. Next came a new emphasis on economies of scale and time in a work-crazed and profit-obsessed culture. Time became much more of the essence because of gridlocked traffic commutes in automobiles along these superhighways. Money could be saved and productivity enhanced by businesses if they consolidated. Consumers could share the savings. Super-stores replaced specialty stores. Conglomerates replaced independents. So into this mix came a man from the opposite direction, from small-town America, named Sam Walton. He had a knack for five-and-dime retailing and a strategy to develop mass merchandising discount stores in rural areas. More precisely, he went not into the rural towns, but to their outer edges. In time Wal-Mart and urban sprawl came together geographically and culturally. What if he had decided to buy abandoned downtown property instead of building warehouses on barren outskirts? Might that have countered this cancer? You can't justifiably say that. Acquisition of undeveloped land was cheaper. Walton could build to his own famously Spartan standards and for his specific needs. Most importantly, he could make the required concession to the pre-existing cultural pathology by pouring concrete for free parking lots for those damnable motor cars. All along the Wal-Mart model was to pay relatively low wages, squash union notions and limit employee benefits to the bare essentials. There are those - sociologists and such - who make a devastating cultural observation. They say that in the preceding generations, emerging American business giants such as General Motors always enhanced wages and fringe benefits, but that Wal-Mart is the first to lead the other way. It's powerfully true that the growing gap between the rich and poor is nowhere more evident than in the contrast of major Wal-Mart stockholders and every-day Wal-Mart shoppers. But the pro-executive, anti-union, benefit-stingy modern American business culture is one that transcends any one company, even Wal-Mart. It's the result of business-first political thinking that, with a couple of brief interruptions, has dominated America for three decades. As for environmental and cultural damage from urban sprawl, Wal-Mart could hardly be blamed. Sam Walton could only be faulted for rural sprawl. Then he looked up and saw urban sprawl coming out to him. Wal-Mart is not a cancer on the economy. And it is not the real cancer on the culture. It is only a mighty, mighty symptom.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • No sympathy for Sarah Huckabee Sanders

    Oh, to have the privilege to look at Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders through an objective lens. I sure can't, and I am to the point where if I hear one more progressive or even centrist Democrat claim they disagree with her policies then in the next sentence point out that she is "so good at her job" or she has taken on a "tough role," I may scream.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Dress code bias

    • About the comparison of boys shorts verses girls short shorts in schools is no way…

    • on September 23, 2018
  • Re: Moving deck chairs

    • Outstanding commentary. Excellent points about the efficiency and cost savings of mega agencies. What a…

    • on September 22, 2018
  • Re: Character judgement

    • i guess i have different standards for 'reasonable doubt.' the kavanaugh train passed that station…

    • on September 21, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation