What now? 

Now that voters have turned down a sales tax to restore staff for the County Jail, county officials must decide what comes next. Another reduction in jail beds seems the likeliest immediate fallout and release of more people better held in jail.

The anti-tax demagogues generally have offered little more than bland assurances that there’s plenty of money available to keep the public safe. But some people do have some ideas, including the following from a local government professional that I pass along as food for thought:

• No more expensive special elections, certainly not two months before a general election in which a far more representative turnout would participate. Clearly, the lack of clutter allowed opponents to get uncommon attention for free media coverage.

• County officials blame old federal litigation for a cap on jail prisoners. But that case has been settled and dismissed. Jails all over the country routinely operate over a facility’s stated capacity. Why can’t we stack more prisoners in the existing space, as long as staffing guidelines are followed?

• County Judge Buddy Villines needs to stop complaining about the interlocal agreement that makes the jail the county’s responsibility. He can’t claim ignorance, having been Little Rock mayor when the deal was struck. Also, the cities have contributed in excess of what the agreement requires annually. It is also a fiction that the cities “don’t pay their share.” Most of the county’s money comes from sales and property taxes collected within the limits of incorporated areas.

• Convert an unused school into barracks to book and hold DWI offenders, with the cost shared by all local governments. The barracks could provide transportation for inmates to jobs during the day and also alcohol rehab programs. There’d be guaranteed incarceration for offenses, but no impact on the jail.

• Increase use of electronic monitoring of minor offenders and people on bail. Local governments could pass ordinances that require sensors in trouble areas — where alcohol is sold, for example — that would sound an alarm when someone with an ankle bracelet strolled in.

• Instead of studying how much money is needed, study what kind of jail is needed. Exactly how was the estimate for 1,600 beds reached? Would we really need that many if home detention, alternative sentences and different handling of DWI offenders were provided?

• Consider a residential alternative school for disruptive students.

• Press the state for more than cash payments to counties for backed-up state prisoners. The state could, for example, provide guards, medical care and education programs for youthful offenders. A substantial sum could be saved, my source claims, by sending prisoners to UAMS for free medical care.

• Rather than paying the large cost of transporting prisoners to district courts around the county, let the district judges set up a schedule to handle initial appearances, pleas and other routine proceedings at the jail.

Yes, some of this would cost money. That’s why I never fully understood the criticism from those who said they preferred prevention and treatment programs to expanding the jail. Those programs are costly, too, and at best long-term solutions. Meanwhile, revolving-door crooks are breaking into a home near you.


Sign up for the Daily Update email


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Are you being served?

    These aren't good times for confidence in public servants.

    • Mar 22, 2018
  • Send in the segs

    The state Board of Education last week rejected requests from Camden Fairview, Hope, Lafayette County and Junction City to be exempt from the state law requiring students to be able to freely transfer between school districts.
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • Rich get richer

    Arkansas State University heard from a paid consultant last week about ways to become more efficient — make more money, in other words — and perhaps even serve students better.
    • Mar 8, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Week That Was

    • The credibility of anyone thinking Trump did anything felonious is even more wanting. If Hillary…

    • on April 20, 2018
  • Re: Week That Was

    • "What is Ernie going to say in 2020 when Trump wins his second term?" The…

    • on April 20, 2018
  • Re: Week That Was

    • One wonders how much of that wonderful weed Ernie has been smoking to think that…

    • on April 20, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation