Favorite

What the Huck? 

It's a given that health care reform is political poison. But even Republicans have said elements of it have merit.

For example, one Republican alternative would have made it illegal to deny insurance coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.

So it was somewhat surprising when Mike Huckabee tore into this part of the law Saturday at the Value Voters Summit — a Washington cattle call for the Religious Right and other extremists:

"It sounds so good, and it's such a warm message to say we're not gonna deny anyone from a preexisting condition," Huckabee said. "Look, I think that sounds terrific, but I want to ask you something from a common sense perspective. Suppose we applied that principle [to] our property insurance. And you can call your insurance agent and say, 'I'd like to buy some insurance for my house.' He'd say, 'Tell me about your house.' 'Well sir, it burned down yesterday, but I'd like to insure it today.' And he'll say 'I'm sorry, but we can't insure it after it's already burned.' Well, no preexisting conditions."

It was classic Huckstering, worth a quick chuckle only if you didn't listen very closely.

The health care legislation includes mandated coverage so that people will have insurance before they get sick. A bigger pool of insured will spread the cost of treatment over more people and hold costs down. Plus, comparing people with pre-existing medical conditions to burned houses (or wrecked cars, which Huckabee also did) is just wrong.

As a Little Rock lawyer observed on our Arkansas Blog, "Gov. Huckabee's analogy fails because health insurance — even when it applies to pre-existing conditions — is an agreement to reimburse for or pay medical costs incurred in the future. It is not at all like insuring a house that has already burned down, an event that has already occurred." If you insure a child with asthma, you're not providing reimbursement for asthma, you're buying coverage for possible costs of a future asthma attack.

Children's needs are important because, beginning this week, insurance companies are no longer able to deny coverage for kids based on pre-existing conditions. The prohibition extends to all by 2014. Some polling shows that majority opposition to health care reform falls apart when respondents learn repeal would cancel this significant advancement.

And yet there was Huckabee, aiming straight at one of the most popular parts of the bill.

Maybe it was just the old Rove strategy of attacking an opponent's strength. So far, Huckabee's lame analogy has won him nearly universal condemnation on the web (though, oddly, hardly a mention in Arkansas news coverage.) Many commentators found it a particularly callous position from a former preacher. Rick Ungar of Forbes wrote that "Huckabee's remarks today, dripping with sarcasm and lacking feeling for Americans with serious medical challenges, are far from befitting a man who not only seeks to be a national leader but presumes to minister the Word of God."

Huckabee has acknowledged his propensity to push a metaphor or joke too far. But this wasn't about cow flatulence; it was about life and death.

The effect of Mike Huckabee's message couldn't be clearer. Those who can't afford health coverage — the child born with a grave medical problem, the woman whose breast cancer recurs after a period of remission — can just die. No death panel required. Welcome to "values," circa 2010.

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • The Arkansas swamp

    The Arkansas Capitol is a fetid swamp of corruption and the bipartisan lack of concern tells you plenty.
    • Jun 14, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • That isn't what I said, and you know that pretty well, Oaf. Just lies and…

    • on June 23, 2018
  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • Rabbi, you probably don't know Steven. He's the head Kool-Aid taster for the Trump cult…

    • on June 22, 2018
  • Re: The cult of Trump

    • Those traits sound like most any politician in DC, mostly the Dims.

    • on June 22, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation