Favorite

Who's parsing now? 

Gov. Mike Huckabee has always had much in common with Bill Clinton. An audience-attuned glibness is but one of their shared characteristics, along with a Hope birthplace, Baptist upbringings, big appetites now curbed and at least one obvious moral blind spot. (In The Huckster’s case it’s a love of money, perks and power that has periodically put him in compromising positions.)

Today the subject is wordplay and Huckabee’s need to learn, as Clinton did, that presidential candidates’ words are generally recorded and subject to cross-check.

Huckabee visited the editorial board of the Concord (N.H.) Monitor last week, one of many such stops he’s making as he prepares the ground for a 2008 presidential bid.

You should know, as Huckabee probably did, that the Concord newspaper endorsed John Kerry in 2004. You should know, too, that New Hampshire’s motto is Live Free or Die. There’s a strong live-and-let-live streak in the state’s voters. They haven’t approved same-sex marriage or civil unions, but they haven’t hurried to pass a law or constitutional amendment banning them either. A 2003 Granite State Poll by the University of New Hampshire showed 54 percent willing to support civil unions of same-sex couples.

With that context, we now turn to the Huckabee editorial board interview. In a news account of the interview, Huckabee was quoted as calling himself a “paradoxical Republican.” Afer all, he's backed both tax cuts and expensive government social programs. Indeed, the strongest growth in Arkansas during the Huckabee era (the weakest economic record of a modern governor, according to a recent study) was in the government jobs sector.

The article also said this: “He’s against gay marriage — ‘That’s not marriage,’ he said — but open to state-supported civil unions.”

“Open” to state-supported civil unions? I was surprised. In a 2002 candidate survey by Project Vote Smart reported in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Huckabee said he opposed civil unions. He endorsed the Arkansas constitutional amendment that outlawed both same-sex marriage and civil unions. This month, he’s enthusiastically endorsed a South Carolina proposal that would similarly ban civil unions as well as gay marriage.

I asked the newspaper for the direct quote. I received a transcript of a tape recording of the session. Huckabee’s comment on civil unions came when he was asked if he would leave such matters as gay marriage to the states.

“I think we should. . . . If people want to live a certain way, that’s their business. I can respect that. If they want to change the definitions of institutions, then that needs to be thoroughly aired in the public square and decided upon by the whole culture.”

He went on to say “ … I don’t have a problem with there being a federal marriage amendment, in fact I would support it. Because then you’d have uniformity in that definition. …”

What about civil unions, he was asked by the newspaper.

“I would tend to leave that to the state, as long as they wanted to not call it a marriage. Now if they’d call it a marriage, then I’d have a problem with it, because again, you’re redefining an institution, you’re not simply allowing people to live.”

So. It appears that Huckabee is open to civil unions (when speaking in more tolerant New Hampshire) except when he’s against them (in Arkansas and South Carolina and undoubtedly other states with a less pronounced live-and-let-live streak). And they said Clinton was slick.


Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Trump's 'deal' on wall and dreamers is no bargain

    Donald Trump unveiled his great plan today — temporary protection for "dreamers" in return for  $5.7 billion worth of wall — but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has already explained why it falls short and some on is side are already crying "no amnesty."
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • An open line for reproductive justice

    Rain drove the speakers inside to the old Senate chamber at the state Capitol, but the rally for reproductive justice went on today as does the fight in a state where the majority who assemble at the Capitol most often act to restrict women's medical rights. The line is open on this and other topics.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • Cotton, Boozman propose estate tax bonanza for billionaires

    Tom Cotton and John Boozman are dishonestly touting legislation that is a bonanza for the super wealthy as help for small businesses and farmers.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Newspaper transformation

    Forty-six years ago this week I visited Little Rock in hopes of getting a job at the Arkansas Gazette. Then-Managing Editor Robert Douglas was friendly, but said (with good reason) that I was a little green.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Hope and change LR

    While I was away, Frank Scott Jr. won a historic victory in a runoff with Baker Kurrus to succeed Mark Stodola as Little Rock mayor.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A real mayor

    Baker Kurrus is trying to brand himself as an agent for change as mayor of Little Rock, but labors under a handicap.
    • Nov 22, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • How nice... the lawyerly Democritus offers a personal criticism, without benefit of the reason for…

    • on January 18, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Please tell me that the Times did not give Lyons money to produce this drivel…

    • on January 17, 2019
 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation