Will the minority rule? 

I’m a reformed smoker. I understand the addiction.

The hardest week of my life was those seven days in 1974 when I first put my Marlboros down. The hardest of all was day five, a white-knuckle drive through a snowstorm from Hot Springs to Little Rock, a pack of cigarettes beckoning in the glove box.

Both my parents smoked and died from cigarette-related ailments. I remember my father reaching for his shirt pocket and a cigarette in an ICU in Louisiana after a cerebral hemorrhage. “I never go anywhere without cigarettes,” he said in his brain fog. My mother, whose smoking began, like so many others, during her war years in India, was hooked until her last days in a nursing home (chosen in part for its accommodation of smokers). Six years after her death, on humid days, the tobacco funk in her old car still recalls her habit.

But if I understand the addiction and, yes, the pleasure of smoking, I don’t understand why an ever smaller percentage of the population is able to force its habit on others.

We don’t allow industries to belch noxious fumes on neighbors. We don’t allow people to dump hazardous wastes on the floors of restaurants or offices. But the government allows smokers to subject non-smokers to health-damaging emissions in the name of smokers’ “rights.”

Gov. Mike Huckabee, to his credit, finally came around on this issue. He’d been resistant to smoking bans (though not resistant to political contributions from tobacco companies). But the science and public sentiment brought him over. He’s become the leading proponent of legislation to ban smoking in the workplace in Arkansas. An overwhelming majority favors such legislation. No wonder. Nearly 80 percent of the adults in the country don’t smoke.

As I write, the status of this legislation is uncertain. It’s expected to face a fight. The tobacco companies will fight, naturally. The so-called “hospitality industry” will fight. This is the real mystery. Why does an industry that depends on creating a welcoming environment insist on allowing the pollution of that environment to please one customer out of every five?

I’m mystified, too, that city officials in Little Rock have been so timid about this issue. They desperately hope that a statewide ban will save them from a tough decision. Again, they fear the 20 percent. Little Rock officials have been quoted as saying a smoking ordinance would drive bar business to North Little Rock. Forget for a minute puzzling out why North Little Rock would be proud to be known as an oasis for carcinogens. Instead ponder whether some of the 80 percent might do as we do — avoid restaurants where a hamburger all the way includes a side of tobacco smoke.

We’re sorry the governor’s bill includes a smoking exemption for places that don’t allow employees or customers younger than 21. But that’s at least easier to enforce than an exemption tied to food service. The Fayetteville anti-smoking ordinance has become a loophole war. If you cook food, you can’t have smoking, the city says. But if you don’t cook food, you can’t have a liquor license.

New York, Florida and California, to name a few, have statewide smoking bans. They seem to be prospering. Why must Arkansas be held hostage to second-hand smoke by the tyranny of 20 percent of the adult population?


Sign up for the Daily Update email


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Double-talk

    A couple of instances of doublespeak cropped up in Little Rock over the weekend.
    • Jun 29, 2017
  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Are you being served?

    These aren't good times for confidence in public servants.

    • Mar 22, 2018
  • Send in the segs

    The state Board of Education last week rejected requests from Camden Fairview, Hope, Lafayette County and Junction City to be exempt from the state law requiring students to be able to freely transfer between school districts.
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • Rich get richer

    Arkansas State University heard from a paid consultant last week about ways to become more efficient — make more money, in other words — and perhaps even serve students better.
    • Mar 8, 2018
  • More »

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Ways to serve

    • A sharper distinction between example of Outstanding Character and No Character could not have been…

    • on May 21, 2018
  • Re: Bad law

    • First paragraph, addresses the problems... "How dirty is San Francisco? An NBC Bay Area Investigation…

    • on May 21, 2018
  • Re: Flooding the swamp

    • The posted price for humalog insulin in the USA is 588$ in Canada it is…

    • on May 21, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation