Favorite

Words Feb. 2 

 An advertisement for “Say What You Mean! A Troubleshooter’s Guide to English Style and Usage” by R.L. Trask included this example from the book:


“EXCEPTION THAT PROVES THE RULE, THE — The sense of this expression is often lost. What it means is this: having an exception to the rule proves there is a rule in the first place.”


I used to agree with that interpretation, until I actually thought about it. If an exception proves the existence of a rule, do two or three or four exceptions prove it even more conclusively? Or, on the contrary, do a bunch of exceptions prove there is no rule worth paying attention to?


Once, I believed I’d gained enlightenment from The Penguin Dictionary of American English Style and Usage:


“As it is commonly used, this cliche [the exception that proves the rule] contradicts scientific logic. Yet those invoking it assume that it bolsters their points of view. … A TV commentator stated a rule that caucus winners lose elections and added, ‘Jimmy Carter, the exception that proves the rule, won Iowa in 1976.’


“How can an exception ‘prove’ a rule? Shouldn’t the exception disprove it? The answer lies in an archaic meaning of prove: to test … A scientist may test a rule (or theory, principle, etc.) by seeking an exception; finding one is reason to discard, or at least modify, the rule. Users of the cliché, unaware of its true meaning, cite it as authority to keep the rule despite the exception.”


If I’d stopped there, I could have been happy, I think. Rashly, I consulted yet another source, Garner’s Dictionary of Modern American Usage: “This phrase is the popular rendering of what was originally a legal maxim, ‘The exception proves (or confirms) the rule in the cases not excepted’ (exception probat regulam in casibus non exceptis). Originally exception in this maxim meant ‘the action of excepting’ – not, as is commonly supposed, ‘that which is excepted’ – so that the true sense of the maxim was that by specifying the cases excepted, one strengthens the hold of the rule over all cases not excepted.”


Garner says there are at least two “spurious” explanations of the phrase. “One is that because a rule does not hold in all instances (i.e., has exceptions), the rule must be valid. … A more sophisticated, but equally false, explanation of the phrase is that prove here retains its Elizabethan sense (derived from the Latin) ‘to test’ … ”


Even H.W. Fowler’s classic Dictionary of Modern English Usage can’t help. Fowler’s page-long entry is, as Garner warned, “all but incomprehensible.” I think I’ll just avoid using exception that proves the rule. That’s a sound approach to cliches generally, come to think of it.



Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Doug Smith

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

More by Max Brantley

Most Shared

Latest in Words

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

July

S M T W T F S
  1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Narrow opening for Arkansas Democrats

    "Somebody in this room — it's time to go big or go home." At the Democratic Party of Arkansas's Clinton Dinner last weekend, Gov. John Bel Edwards of Louisiana used his platform as keynote speaker to embolden a candidate to step up to run for governor against incumbent Republican Governor Hutchinson.
  • Head-shaking

    Another edition of so-much-bad-news-so-little space.
  • Buyer remorse

    Out here in flyover country, you can't hardly go by the feed store without running into a reporter doing one of those Wisdom of the Heartland stories.
  • Not Whitewater

    Just think: If Democrats had turned out 78,000 more votes in three states in November, people could be reveling today in the prospect of impeaching and convicting President Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, as some Republican lawmakers had promised to try to do if she won.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Another Jesus

    • I always enjoy reading your articles Autumn. You keep being the caring person you are…

    • on July 26, 2017
  • Re: Another Jesus

    • Sorry, I have never written about Hillary Clinton's "blunders" in Benghazi. Since you call them…

    • on July 25, 2017
  • Re: Another Jesus

    • IBS, were you there in Benghazi to personally witness all of Hillary's blunders like you…

    • on July 23, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation