Favorite

Words May 19 

“That is precisely why programs like ‘The Newshour with Jim Lehrer’ and ‘Washington Week’ are so important — because they offer in-depth reporting about the real issues rather than focusing on celebrities or offering fast-paced sound bytes.” Those are sound bites — short and provocative quotations — not sound bytes. The name comes from bite-sized, not from computer terminology. “A. Tenenbaum Co. is 115 years old, but a year and a half of sky-high steel prices have made these the salad days.” Salad days are a period of youthful inexperience. I don’t understand how a 115-year-old company is only now getting around to its salad days, but maybe I just don’t have a head for business. “A Dumas couple on Thursday was awarded $1 million by the state Claims Commission for severe injuries suffered when a state police cruiser struck their vehicle three years ago.” Whether you treat couple as singular or plural, you’re stuck with your choice at least until the end of the sentence. Both verbs and pronouns have to match the noun in number. So, if a couple was (singular) awarded, then the police cruiser struck its (singular) vehicle. The sentence reads better if you go plural all the way. “A Dumas couple were awarded … when a police cruiser struck their vehicle.” Most of the time, you can’t go wrong treating couple as a plural. Speaking of couple, is it correct to say “Give me a couple of doughnuts,” or should it be “Give me a couple doughnuts”? Garner’s Dictionary of Modern American Usage says: “Omitting the of is slipshod in such a construction as this: ‘Is a used toilet seat worth $1 million? Or even a couple [read couple of] hundred thousand dollars?’ In other words, using couple not as a noun but as an adjective is poor usage: instead of a couple days ago, say a couple of days ago.” A colleague asks if it’s toward or towards. I think they’re pretty much interchangeable these days, but some authorities still say that in American English, the preferred form is toward, while towards is preferred in British English.
Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Doug Smith

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

More by Max Brantley

Latest in Words

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • She's no Jeff Sessions

    Wouldn't it be refreshing if Arkansas had an attorney general as dedicated to the rule of law as Jeff Sessions?
  • Trump train derailed

    So here's my question: If Trump's going to make America great again, when was America last great? And what was so great about it?
  • Medicaid favor

    Arkansas's distinctive form of Medicaid expansion has been precarious since its creation in 2013 by a bipartisan coalition.
  • Living in poverty

    To successfully raise children as a single mother living in poverty in Central Arkansas requires a staggering amount of resilience, a significant amount of support from loved ones and the community, and at least a little bit of luck.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Week That Was

    • The other worrisome one is the one with the email of 'zyklonwolf', which any historically…

    • on April 23, 2018
  • Re: Week That Was

    • Steven, Thank you for your kind invite, however, I have relocated to the other Arkansas,…

    • on April 22, 2018
  • Re: Week That Was

    • Nice hyperbole and exaggeration, Oaf, but we all know how blown out the parody of…

    • on April 22, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation