Favorite

Words, Nov. 5 

Not only a lawyer but a lawyer who consorts with Antonin Scalia, Bryan A. Garner sounds like a person I'd stay well clear of, if I didn't write a column on language. Since I do, I lean heavily on Mr. Garner. Though we've never met, I've quoted him so often that I can't quibble with the Oxford University Press, his publisher, when it makes the rather grand claim, “Since first appearing in 1998, Garner's Modern American Usage has established itself as the preeminent guide to effective use of the English language.”

My copy of that first edition is practically in tatters. Just in time, Garner has produced a revised third edition, bigger and to all appearances even better. If a person is seriously interested in the state of the language, and reasonably well off, GMAU is worth the $45 asking price. (Easy for me to say. I got my copy free, in that sly way newspaper people have. Newspaper people are notoriously not well off.)

A word of warning, or encouragement, depending on your point of view: Garner is not a descriptivist, as many authorities are today. He's a prescriptivist, as many authorities used to be. He doesn't describe the various ways people write and talk, and allow you to pick your own path. He tells you what's right, and orders you aboard. It's my impression this is what most people want, although I myself have grown less prescriptive over the years, a result of discovering that many revered old rules I'd learned in schoolroom and newsroom were capricious bunk.

An example of the Garner perspective: While reading proof recently, I came across gauntlet used to mean “an ordeal.” The old rule was that gantlet was the word for this usage (run the gantlet) and gauntlet was a glove (throw down the gauntlet). The trend now is to use gauntlet in all cases, and Random House goes along with the trend. Garner does not. “Keep gantlet for the ordeal,” he says.

The Scalia connection? He and Garner co-wrote a book on the art of persuading judges. Scalia's had great success with Clarence Thomas, I hear.

Favorite

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Doug Smith

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

Latest in Words

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Living in poverty

    To successfully raise children as a single mother living in poverty in Central Arkansas requires a staggering amount of resilience, a significant amount of support from loved ones and the community, and at least a little bit of luck.
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation