Favorite

‘The decision and the opinions will be impactful,’ said Francisco Negron, general counsel of the National School Boards Association, which has supported the school districts in the lower courts.”

Jim Lynch writes: “Note the use of ‘impactful.’ Really now! For years I have been annoyed by people changing the noun ‘impact’ to a verb, and now this!”

The Penguin Dictionary of American English Usage and Style feels as strongly about impact as Lynch does. Originally, impact (pronounced IM-pact) was a noun meaning “a violent contact or a striking of an object against another, or the force or shock of that contact or striking together,” Penguin says. Then it began to be misused as a synonym for effect, influence, result, etc., as in “The floods will have a very small impact on prices.”

“Strictly speaking, ‘a very small impact’ is a contradiction,” Penguin says. “Use impact to suggest violence or power in the way things come together.”

Already weakened, impact was further abused by being forced into illegitimate verbhood, as in “The question is how the downtown ballpark will impact our already congested streets and highways.” The verb should be affect, not impact, Penguin says, and the only correct use of impact as a verb is “to squash something or to press things together tightly, the way a garbage truck impacts garbage.” In that case, the word is pronounced im-PACT rather than IM-pact.

And finally Penguin gets to the latest outrage: “On a radio talk show, a lawyer presented the type of final argument that he thought the prosecution should make in a current murder trial. The hostess responded with an adjectival creation, ‘It’s an impactful statement to have been made,’ as though the misuse of the i-word as a noun and a verb were not enough.”

I share the Lynch-Penguin concerns, but to be fair, I have to report that not everyone does. The Random House Dictionary says that the verb impact (pronounced IM-pact), meaning “to have an impact or effect on,” is, though recent, now “entirely standard.” Random House does not recognize impactful, however, and neither does my spellchecker. Maybe we can hold the line there. Probably not.


Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

  |  

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Doug Smith

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

More by Max Brantley

Most Shared

Latest in Words

  • The L word and the C word

    I was excited to see the newspaper headline "Bielema liberal." "After all those neo-Nazis, we've finally got a coach who thinks right," I told friends. "I wonder if he belongs to the ADA."
    • May 1, 2014
  • Who's exasperated?

    Jim Newell was gripped by exasperation himself after reading this item in the business section. "Exacerbated" is the word the writer wanted, he sagely suggests.
    • Apr 24, 2014
  • We will run no race before it's ripe

    "What year would Oaklawn recognize as its 100th anniversary? After all, Oaklawn's advertising material is ripe with 'Since 1904,' but it's widely reported the first race wasn't run until 1905."
    • Apr 17, 2014
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

December

S M T W T F S
  1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31  

Most Viewed

  • Gratitude

    Now, more than ever, I find myself thankful for those who resist. Those who remind us of our higher common values. The fact-checkers and truth-tellers. Those who build bridges in communities instead of walls to segregate. The ones who stand up and speak out against injustice.
  • A difference

    How low can a columnist go? On evidence, nowhere near as low as the president of the United States. I'd intended to highlight certain ironies in the career of U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). The self-anointed moral arbiter of the Senate began her career as a tobacco company lawyer — that is, somebody ill-suited to demand absolute purity of anybody, much less Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).
  • Money talks

    Democratic candidates face a dilemma in Arkansas. To take on the GOP members who are firmly entrenched in the state Legislature and Congress, they will need lots of money and lots of votes. The easiest way to get more votes is to spend more money. Obscene amounts of money. And thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision and President Trump's judicial appointments, this will be our reality for a long time. The six Republicans who make up our congressional delegation have stopped pretending to care about their constituents. They vote in line with the interests of big corporations and lobbyists. They know what side their bread is buttered on.
  • Silly acts, good law

    It was unavoidable that the struggle by sexual minorities to gain the equal treatment that the Constitution promises them would devolve into silliness and that the majestic courts of the land would have to get their dignity sullied in order to resolve the issues.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: A difference

    • Gillibrand is a tough chick, and she knows she is a political whore, like 95%…

    • on December 14, 2017
  • Re: Cats and dogs

    • I miss my wolves. It has been over five years since the last of my…

    • on December 12, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation