Favorite

Yes, there's political life after taxes 

Nobody else will say it and there's no cause to be effusive about it but the Arkansas legislature is entitled to a little praise and more than a little understanding. Whenever the legislative branch and the executive pick a fight with one another, the legislative branch always takes a public thrashing. So it is that Governor Huckabee is enjoying rapturous flattery across the media for standing up for school consolidation and sweeping educational reform while the legislature is razzed for dragging its feet on the same. But courage doesn't reside exclusively with the governor or cravenness with the legislature. Taxes, not consolidation, is the paramount issue of the session and the legislature at this writing earns more understanding on that than Huckabee, who hasn't lifted a hand to help and isn't sure he'll even go along with taxes if the legislature does lead. Before we leave the subject, let this be noted about consolidation. This legislature has enacted more draconian school consolidation measures than any before it: a law that abolishes school districts with fewer than 350 students and another, last spring, that empowers the governor's proxies at the Education Department to abolish every school district that does not meet the state's specifications. It does not matter that a few legislators seem not to have known what they were doing and that the governor seems reluctant to use the power. The vast majority of school consolidations the last century occurred administratively. The Education Department negotiated a reduction in school districts from 5,100 to 3,000 in 1928-32 and then, aided by the Depression, reduced them to 1,600 by the end of World War II. Now the legislature must do the hardest thing that a representative body has to do, raise taxes, which unlike consolidation, actually is a silent mandate from the Supreme Court. Lawmakers have to do it under the worst conditions and under the mistaken belief that certain retribution awaits them from the voters if they do. It was oh so different when this all began. The Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce, which commands the most fearsome lobby in government, intervened in the school case to ask the Supreme Court to outlaw the state's sorry schools and announced that it favored a big tax increase to improve education. The preconversion Huckabee, who then opposed consolidation and taxes, denounced the chamber. He was too hasty. Now the lawmakers are hearing from a phalanx of business lobbyists what the chamber really meant. It will not stand in the way if the legislature sticks it to working stiffs and their families by jacking up the sales tax on commodities but lawmakers will pay with their political careers if they vote to take a dollar out of corporate fiscs or from the pockets of the rich to educate poor children. Joined by the editorial page of the Democrat-Gazette, they came down hard on the House committee considering the first little bill, which would plug one of the many loopholes found by creative accountants to allow multistate corporations the past 10 years to virtually withdraw from the state corporate income tax. Corporate income taxes have been declining the past eight years even as profits soared. Fear of big business pocketbooks is one thing, fear of average voters is another. They are always more understanding. There is almost no history in modern Arkansas of voters punishing legislators who vote to raise taxes. An analysis of roll calls on all seven significant tax programs from 1957 through 1989 showed that there was little difference in the re-election rates of those who voted for taxes and those who voted against them and, in fact, a slightly higher percentage of those who voted against them were defeated in the next election than of those who favored them. The omnibus tax program of 1991, Bill Clinton's last, and the highway tax program of 1997 also produced no discernible backlash at the polls. Legislators might take some comfort by looking at the most analogous situation to theirs: the 1971 tax program of Gov. Dale Bumpers to finance school improvements. Bumpers said he would not sign a sales tax increase because it landed unfairly on low- and middle-income families. He asked the legislature to raise income taxes to reach high-income taxpayers, cigarette taxes, beer taxes and other excises and to broaden the sales tax base to cover some services, all in separate bills so that legislators had to record a vote for taxes numerous times. Bumpers called legislators to his office and said the tax increases would be his, not theirs. One of the smallest turnovers in modern times occurred at the next election. Five of the 106 legislators who voted for the centerpiece, the income tax, were defeated and five of the 28 who opposed it went down. Opponents were four times as likely to be defeated. The difference is that this time the courage will be altogether theirs. No governor will be standing behind them. They should find that exhilarating.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Along the civil rights trail

    A convergence of events in recent days signaled again how far we have come and how far we have yet to go in civil rights.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • The Oval outhouse

    One thing all Americans finally can agree upon is that public discourse has coarsened irretrievably in the era of Donald Trump and largely at his instance.
    • Jan 18, 2018
  • Shrugging off sulfides

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported a shocker on its front page Sunday. The rotten-egg odor from the Koch brothers' sprawling paper plant at Crossett is still making people sick, but the state's pollution control agency is unaware of the problem.
    • Mar 29, 2018

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • ACA will stand

    If you are worried about your health care — and that ought to be nearly everyone — pay no attention to the triumphant tweet of President Trump last Friday or the hurrah the same day from Leslie Rutledge, the Arkansas attorney general, after the most political judge in America declared the whole Affordable Care Act null and void.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Sex and Trump

    No one, least of all Donald Trump, should be surprised when sex puts him in mortal jeopardy, which seemed to be the case last week when his personal lawyer pleaded guilty to violating the law by arranging $280,000 in hush payments to a porn actress and a Playboy model who were prepared to tell voters about having sex with him.
    • Dec 13, 2018
  • A decent man

    The beatification of George H.W. Bush, which even the current president signaled was OK, would have surprised the 41st president, who seemed to have accepted the public's verdict that, although a waffler, he was a decent man who did his best and didn't do any harm to the people of the country or the world with whose well-being he was entrusted for a time.
    • Dec 6, 2018
  • More »

Most Viewed

  • Of Freud and foolishness

    I’ve been suspicious of psychologists bearing theories ever since my graduate school "Eureka!" about Freud and Dostoyevsky.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • Wondering what my name would be if not for Jonathan Swift. Probably Pamela.

    • on January 15, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • i would not necessarily regard this correlation as evidence of 'toxic' effects, but some years…

    • on January 15, 2019
  • Re: Of Freud and foolishness

    • I can only speak for myself; but, it seems that I was never quite so…

    • on January 15, 2019
 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation